Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Finding the ingredients on food product labels can be critical for safety and health. This study examines whether the amount of time it takes to locate an ingredients list on a food product label depends on its physical location, or its position relative to a conspicuous landmark, the nutrition facts panel (NFP). The position of the ingredients list was manipulated with respect to 6 potential label locations and its position relative to the NFP, yielding 30 possible combinations of locations for the ingredients list and NFP. Participants were shown the set of 30 layouts in random order, with instructions to find the ingredients list on each layout. Response time (ms) for finding the ingredients list was recorded. Analyses indicated a significant vertical position effect, with placement on the bottom producing longer response times than the top or middle positions. Other analyses examined the relative distance between the ingredients and the NFP, which showed that participants found the ingredients list faster when it were located near the NFP, as opposed to placements furthest away. Implications for the understanding search times on relatively complex labels are discussed. Benefits for health and safety through better food labeling are described.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bzostek

J. A.

Wogalter

M. S.

(1999). Measuring visual search time for a product warning label as a function of icon, color, column and vertical placement. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43, 888-892.

Goodman

J. K.

Cryder

C. E.

Cheema

(2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213-224.

Grishin

Walkington

Wogalter

M. S.

(2015). Formatting food labels for safety and health: On finding the ingredients faster. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59, 1476-1480.

Lim

R. A.

Wogalter

M. S.

(2000). The position of static and on-off banners in WWW displays on subsequent recognition. Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association & the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Congress, 44 (1), 420-423.

Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (1990). U. S. Public Law No. 101-535, 104 Stat 2353.

Paolacci

Chandler

Ipeirotis

P. G.

(2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment & Decision making, 5, 411-419.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2015). Title 21: Food & Drugs, Part 101, Subpart A, 101.2.b, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from U.S. Government Printing Office: http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=378948261bd4981f96cfc2a82505a840&r=SECTION&n=21y2.0.1.1.2.1.1.2

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2016). Changes to the Nutrition Facts Label. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm385663.htm#images

Wogalter

M. S.

Kalsher

M. J.

(1994). Product label list format: Effects of item arrangement and completeness on comparison time and accuracy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38, 389-393.

10.

Wogalter

M. S.

Shaver

E. F.

Chan

L. S.

(2002). List vs. paragraph formats on time to compare nutrition labels. Contemporary Ergonomics 2002 (pp. 458-462). London: Taylor and Francis.

Improving Food Labels for Health and Safety

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References