Software innovations at our laboratory have made novel measures of shooting performance available to researchers, even when the data comes from a fielded military firearms training simulator not designed for research. This study analyzed specific patterns of rifle handling and control to determine how they affected reaction time and accuracy among shooters of differing skill levels. The results indicated the skilled shooters employed smoother and more efficient rifle movement while aiming than less-skilled shooters. While shooters know that trigger control and sight picture are important, this study confirms that skilled shooting is also influenced by the efficiency of the rifle movements that immediately precede the shot.
ChungG. K. W. K.O’NeilH. F.DelacruzG. C.BewleyW. L. (2005). The role of anxiety on novices’ rifle marksmanship performance. Educational Assessment, 10(3), 257-275.
3.
ChungG. K. W. K.DelacruzG. C.de VriesL. F.BewleyW. L.BakerE. L. (2006). New directions in rifle marksmanship research. Military Psychology, 18(2), 161-179.
4.
ConoverW. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
5.
DeenyS. P.HillmanC. H.JanelleC. M.HatfieldB. D. (2003). Cortico-cortical communication and superior performance in skilled marksmen: An EEG coherence analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(2), 188-204.
6.
Department of the Army. (2011). Rifle Marksmanship M16-/M4- Series Weapons (FM 3-22.9). Washington, DC: Department of the Army Headquarters.
7.
Department of the Army. (2008). U.S. Army weapons systems 2007-2008: Engagement Skills Trainer (EST) 2000. Arlington, VA: OASA Strategy and Performance Planning.
8.
Department of the Army. (1989). M16A1 and M16A2 rifle marksmanship (FM 23-9). Fort Benning, GA.
9.
Department of the Army. (2012). Soldier’s manual of common tasks: Warrior skills level 1 (STP 21-1-SMCT). Washington, D.C.
10.
GaydosS. J.KelleyA. M.WebbC. M.AthyJ. R.WaltersP. L. (2010). Comparison of the effects of Ketamine and Morphine on the performance of representative military tasks (USAARL Report No. 2010-17). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
11.
GrandizioC.LawsonB.KingM.CruzP.KelleyA.EricksonB.LivingstonL.ChoT.LaskowskiB.ChiaramonteJ. (2014). Development of a fitness-for-duty assessment battery for recovering dismounted warriors (USAARL Report No. 2014-18). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
12.
HumphreysL. G.BuxtonC. E.TaylorH. R. (1936). Steadiness and rifle marksmanship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 20(6), 680-688.
13.
JonesH.KingM.GaydosS. (2011). A novel application of the point of aim trace feature for the Engagement Skills Trainer 2000 (USAARL Report No. 2011-14). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
14.
KaneR. L.KayG. G. (1992). Computerized assessment in neuropsychology: A review of tests and test batteries. Neuropsychology Review, 3(1), 1-117.
15.
KelleyA. M.AthyJ. R.KingM.EricksonB.ChiaramonteJ.VasbinderM.ThompsonA. (2011). Think before you shoot: The relationship between cognition and Marksmanship (USAARL Report No. 2011-23). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
16.
KerickS. E.AllenderL. E. (2004). Effects of cognitive workload on decision accuracy, shooting performance, and cortical activity of Soldiers. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Human Research and Engineering Directorate.
17.
LawsonB. D.RanesB.KelleyA. M.WrobelC.EricksonB.MilamL.KingM.ChiaramonteJ.ChoT.LaskowskiB.CampbellJ.ThompsonL.B. I. (In Press). Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI) and Dynamic Simulated Shooting Performance (USAARL Report No. 2016-16). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
18.
LawsonB. D.RupertA. H.ChoT. H. (2013). Functional Screening of Vestibular and Balance Problems Soon After Head Injury: Options in Development for the Field or Aid Station. Journal of Special Operations Medicine, 13(1), 42-48.
19.
LawsonB. D.RupertA. H.LeganS. (2012). Vestibular balance deficits following head injury: recommendations concerning evaluation and rehabilitation in the military setting (USAARL Report No. 2012-10). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
20.
MaloneG. H.RaschP. J. (1964). The prediction of rifle marksmanship by performance tests. Camp Lejune, NC: Naval Medical Field Research Laboratory.
21.
RanesB.LawsonB.KingM.DaileyJ. (2014). Effects of Rifle Handling, Target Acquisition, and Trigger Control on Simulated Shooting Performance (USAARL Report No. 2014-19). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
22.
TaylorF. W. (1919). The Principles of Scientific Management. London and New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
