Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recent marketing efforts claim that by removing saccades, well designed Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) text displays can increase reading speed without an overall loss of comprehension. Due to the cognitive load when displaying long text it has been suggested that RSVP is better utilized in shorter text or longer text presented in small sections. With the introduction of smart watches as display mediums, opportunities for these types of text display have become more prominent due to their small form-factor. These small screen displays have limited space and often are used to convey short messages, which have motivated a closer look at RSVP. In the current study, we investigate the effects of text length and text reading level on comprehension. We compare RSVP to traditional (left-to-right) text presentations. In line with previous studies our results show that there were no differences between comprehension for RSVP and traditional text displays at normal reading speeds. Future, research may focus on the effects of training and familiarity with RSVP and its performance at the marketed higher readings speeds.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beccue

Vila

(2004). Assessing the impact of rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A reading technique. Advanced Distributed Systems, 42-53. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Benedetto

Carbone

Pedrotti

Le Fevre

Bey

L. A. Y.

Baccino

(2015). Rapid serial visual presentation in reading: The case of Spritz. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 352-358.

Bernard

M. L.

Chaparro

B. S.

Russell

(2001). Examining automatic text presentation for small screens. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45(6), 637-639.

Castelhano

M. S.

Muter

(2001). Optimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presentation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(4), 237-247.

Chen

H. C.

(1986). Effects of reading span and textual coherence on rapid-sequential reading. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 202-208.

De Bruijn

Spence

Chong

M. Y

. (2002). RSVP browser: Web browsing on small screen devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6(4), 245-252

Fitzpatrick

Doherty

S. M.

(2004). Copious electronic text on small screen interfaces: a new method of displaying emails on cell phones. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48(5), 750-753.

Forster

K. I.

(1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(4), 215-221.

Hedin

Lindgren

(2007). A Comparison of Presentation Methods for Reading on Mobile Phones. Distributed Systems Online, 8(6), 2-2.

10.

Juola

J. F.

Ward

N. J.

McNamara

(1982). Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 208.

11.

Laarni

(2002). Searching for optimal methods of presenting dynamic text on different types of screens. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: ACM.

12.

Masson

M. E.

(1983). Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 262-274.

13.

Öquist

Lundin

(2007, December). Eye movement study of reading text on a mobile phone using paging, scrolling, leading, and RSVP. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. New York, NY: ACM.

14.

Potter

M. C.

Kroll

J. F.

Harris

(1980). Comprehension and memory in rapid sequential reading. Attention and performance VIII, 395-418.

15.

Proaps

A. B.

Bliss

J. P.

(2014). The effects of text presentation format on reading comprehension and video game performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 41-47.

16.

Rayner

(1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 372.

17.

Rayner

Schotter

E. R.

Masson

M. E.

Potter

M. C.

Treiman

(2016). So Much to Read, So Little Time How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help?. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4-34.

18.

Rubin

G. S.

Turano

(1992). Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision research, 32(5), 895-902.

19.

Schotter

E. R.

Tran

Rayner

(2014). Don’t believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1218-1226.

20.

Taylor

M. M.

(1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.

21.

Cheung

S. H.

Legge

G. E.

Chung

S. T.

(2007). Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 2 .

Exploring the Effects of Text Length and Difficulty on RSVP Reading

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References