This proceeding attempts to review human factors research on virtual teams. The focus is on project-based teams of knowledge workers, the scope is to identify challenges specific to such teams, and the goal is to offer practical solutions. The criteria for working well together are teams that can define, execute, and deliver on work successfully, without excessive intervention from management and outside parties. Current research reminds us that humans are relational and social, which need to be fostered carefully in a virtual team environment. Current research also recommends that teams establish group norms and routines, use technology as an enabler, and be mindful of the constant need to reduce ambiguity.
BayerlP.S.LaucheK.Badke-SchaubP. (2008). Collaborative Environments for Distributed Teams: Comparing Effects of Different Concepts. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Sept 2008, 52, 1140-1144
3.
BearmanC.PaletzS. F.OrasanuJ.ThomasM. W. (2010). The Breakdown of Coordinated Decision Making in Distributed Systems. Human Factors, 52(2), 173-188.
4.
BlokM.GroenesteijnL.FormanoyM.de KortelE.VinkP. (2011). Office Space Use, Performance, Privacy and Satisfaction. Advances in occupational, social, and organizational ergonomics (pp. 218-227). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
5.
Bosch-SijtsemaP.M.FruchterR.VartiainenM.RuohomäkiV. (2011). A Framework to Analyze Knowledge Work in Distributed Teams. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 275-307.
6.
ChenW.McDonaldS. (2015). Do Networked Workers Have More Control? The Implications of Teamwork, Telework, ICTs, and Social Capital for Job Decision Latitude. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(4), 492-507.
7.
CressU.KimmerleJ.HesseF. W. (2009). Impact of temporal extension, synchronicity, and group size on computer-supported information exchange. Computers In Human Behavior, 25(3), 731-737.
8.
DimitrovaD.WellmanB. (2015). Networked Work and Network Research: New Forms of Teamwork in the Triple Revolution. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(4), 443-456.
9.
DourishP.BellottiV. (1992, December). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 107-114). ACM.
10.
GilsonL. L.MaynardM. T. Jones
YoungN. C.VartiainenM.HakonenM. (2015). Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities. Journal Of Management, 41(5), 1313-1337.
11.
HalginD. S.GopalakrishnanG. M.BorgattiS. P. (2015). Structure and Agency in Networked, Distributed Work: The Role of Work Engagement. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(4), 457-474.
LevineR.NorenzayanA. (1999). The Pace of Life in 31 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(2): 178-205.
14.
LuiY. (2011). Trust Development in Distributed Multi-Cultural Teams: Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation. In VinkP.KantolaJ. (Eds.), Advances in occupational, social, and organizational ergonomics (pp. 31-40). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
15.
LundH.HvidH.KampA. (2011). Perceived Time, Temporal Order and Control in Boundaryless Work. Advances in occupational, social, and organizational ergonomics (pp. 250-260). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
16.
McCombS.KennedyD.PerrymanR.WarnerN.LetskyM. (2010). Temporal Patterns of Mental Model Convergence: Implications for Distributed Teams Interacting in Electronic Collaboration Spaces. Human Factors, 52(2), 264-281.
17.
OrbachM.DemkoM.DoyleJ.WaberB. N.PentlandA. (. (2015). Sensing Informal Networks in Organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(4), 508-524.
18.
PeenJ.SchoeversR. A.BeekmanA. T.DekkerJ. (2010). The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 121: 84–93.
19.
ShiraniA. I.TaftiM. H.AffiscoJ. F. (1999). Task and technology fit: a comparison of two technologies for synchronous and asynchronous group communication. Information & Management, 36(3), 139-150.
20.
SparksK.CooperC.FriedY.ShiromA. (1997), The effects of hours of work on health: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70: 391–408.
21.
Yetis-LarssonZ.TeiglandR.DovbyshO. (2015). Networked Entrepreneurs: How Entrepreneurs Leverage Open Source Software Communities. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(4), 475-491.
