Vigilance, or sustained attention, is the ability to maintain attention to stimuli over a prolonged period of time. Synonymous with the study of sustained attention is the vigilance decrement, which is a decline in performance as a function of time on task. In the present study, we examined the effects of state motivation (i.e., motivation measured immediately prior to the task) and context-based motivation (i.e., motivation that stems from task instructions) on vigilance performance in a sensory-based vigilance task. Forty-three participants completed a 24-minute vigilance task, as well as measures of stress and workload. The results indicated that those higher in state intrinsic motivation and motivating instructions outperformed their peers in terms of hits and false alarms. We conclude that motivation may help facilitate vigilant attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DaviesD.R.ParasuramanR. (1982). The Psychology of Vigilance. London, UK: Academic Press.
2.
DeciE.L.EghrariH.PatrickB.C.LeoneD. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.
3.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (2002). Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
4.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
5.
DemberW.N.WarmJ.S.BowersJ.C.LanzettaT. (1984). Intrinsic Motivation and the Vigilance Decrement. Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors, 1, 21-26.
6.
DillardM.B.WarmJ.S.FunkeG.J.VidulichM.A.NelsonW.T.EggemeierT.F.FunkeM.E. (2013). Vigilance: Hard Work Even if Time Flies. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57, 1114-1117.
7.
HancockP.A. (2013). In search of vigilance: The problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. American Psychologist, 68, 97-109.
8.
HartS.G.StavelandL.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139-183.
9.
HughesB.L.ZakiJ. (2015). The neuroscience of motivated cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 62-64. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.006
10.
MatthewsG.CampbellS.E.FalconerS.JoynerL.A.HugginsJ.GillilandK.GrierR.WarmJ.S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion, 2(4), 315-340. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.2.4.315
11.
MatthewsG.WarmJ.S.ShawT.H.FinomoreV.S. (2014). Predicting battlefield vigilance: a multivariate approach to assessment of attentional resources. Ergonomics, 57(6), 856-875. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.899630
12.
ParasuramanR. (2011). Can Behavioral, Neuroimaging, and Molecular Genetic Studies of “Cognitive Superstars” Tell Us How to Augment Cognition?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 55, 192-196.
13.
RyanR.M. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
RyanR.M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
15.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2008). Self-Determination Theory and the Role of Basic Psychology Needs in Personality and the Organization of Behavior. In JohnO.P.RobinsR.W.PervinL.A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (3rd ed.) (pp. 654-678). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
17.
SalcedoJ.N.LackeyS.J.MarajC.Reinerman-JonesL.E. (2014). Impact of Instructional Strategies on Motivation and Engagement for Simulation-Based Training of Robot-Aided ISR Tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 58, 2320-2324.
18.
SeeJ. E.HoweS. R.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N. (1995). Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 230-249.
19.
SzalmaJ.L. (2014). On the Application of Motivation Theory to Human Factors/Ergonomics: Motivational Design Principles for Human-Technology Interaction. Human Factors, 56(8), 1453-1471.
20.
SzalmaJ.L. (2009a). Individual differences in human technology interaction: incorporating variation in human characteristics into human factors and ergonomics research design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10(5), 381-397. doi: 10.1080/14639220902893613
21.
SzalmaJ.L. (2009b). Individual differences in performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention: Optimism and pessimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 444-451. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.019
22.
SzalmaJ.L. (2002). Workload and Stress of Configural Displays in Vigilance Tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(17), 1536-1540.
23.
SzalmaJ.L.MatthewsG. (2015). Motivation and Emotion. In HoffmanR.R.HancockP.A.ScerboM.W.ParasuramanR.SzalmaJ.L. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Applied Perception Research (pp. 218-240). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
WarmJ.S.JerisonH.J. (1984). The psychophysics of vigilance. In WarmJ. S. (Ed.), Sustained Attention in Human Performance (pp. 15-59). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
25.
WarmJ.S.ParasuramanR.MatthewsG. (2008). Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and is Stressful. Human Factors, 50(3), 433-441. doi: 10.1518/001872008X312152
