Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper describes how User Center Design (UCD) methodology has been applied to develop a new visualization concept to support operation and maintenance of an oil and gas facility. The ultimate goal of the work is to improve energy efficiency in plant operation by creating an interactive visual representation of process and equipment dependencies at a modern industrial plant. This visualization concept aims to highlight important information which is today hidden in disparate information sources, and to support collaboration between personnel from different technical disciplines. The paper explains how user studies were used to promote the knowledge elicitation process and how UCD methods are being applied to the definition of functional requirements and to the creation of early concept prototypes.

Keywords

user studies user centered design qualitative research visualization oil and gas

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cecilio

I.M.

Rapp

Thornhill

N.F.

(2012). Process performance analysis and large-scale systems integrating different sources of information, 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes, Singapore.

Dash

Venkatasubramanian

(2000). Challenges in the industrial application of fault diagnostic systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol 24, No 2, pp. 785-791.

Di Geronimo Gil

Alabi

D. B.

Iyun

O. E.

Thornhill

N. F.

, (2011). Merging process models and plant topology. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Advanced Control of Industrial Processes. pp. 15-21

Endsley

(1995). Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37 (1), pp. 32-64

Gabbar

(2007). Intelligent Topology Analyzer for Improved Plant Operation. SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference, pp. 5737-5742

Graven

T. G.

Högberg

(2010). Intelligent Visualization for Decision Support in supervision and Control, SPE Intelligent Energy Conference 2010.

Jamieson

G. A.

Vicente

K. J.

(2001). Ecological interface design for petrochemical applications: supporting operator adaptation, continuous learning, and distributed, collaborative work. Computers and Chemical Engineering, Vol 25, No.7 pp. 1055-1074

Keim

Kohlhammer

Ellis

Mansmann

(2010). Mastering the information age: solving problems with visual analytics. Eurographics Digital Library.

Lind

(1999). Plant Modeling for Human Supervisory Control. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, Vol 21, 1999.

10.

Moreno

C. A.

Bischof

W. F.

Hoover

H. J.

(2012). Interactive visualization of dependencies, Computers and Education 58, Issue 4, pp. 1296-1307.

11.

POSC, Caesar Association (2013a). List of associate members. https://www.posccaesar.org/wiki/PCA/Membership

12.

POSC, Caesar Association (2013b). Integrated Operations in the High North – Joint Industry Project.

Retrieved on 20.06.13

https://www.posccaesar.org/wiki/IOHN

13.

Rasmussen

(1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering, New York, NY, USA: North-Holland; 1986.

14.

Schmidt

Bannon

(1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), an International Journal, 1992.

15.

Thambirajah

Benabbas

Bauer

Thornhill

N. F.

(2007). Cause and Effect Analysis in Chemical Process Utilizing Plant Connectivity Information. Advances in Process Control, Vol 8, pp.1-5

16.

Boling

Available from http://www.userfocus.co.uk/uxstencil/”.

17.

Wilson

T. D.

(2006). On user studies and information needs, Journal of Documentation, Vol 62 No. 6 pp. 658-670

18.

Yang

Xiao

(2012). Progress in Root Cause and Fault Propagation Analysis of Large-Scale Industrial Processes, Journal of Control Science 2012.

Visual representation of connectivity information for efficient system understanding

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References