Tactile Route Guidance Performance and Preference

Abstract

We examined performance and preference for tactile route guidance formats. Participants drove a simulated vehicle through counterbalanced pairings of four distinct cities using one of four navigation systems (three tactile and one auditory control). One tactile system used only the pulse rate, the second system used only tactor location, and the third used both pulse rate and location to convey guidance instructions. All navigation systems provided both a preliminary and an immediate cue indicating to take the next most immediate turn. The pulse-rate route guidance system was the most commonly preferred system. Results also indicate that participants’ ability to accurately retrace their route and identify landmarks did not differ across navigation systems. All four systems resulted in equivalent wayfinding performance and support previous literature indicating that tactile guidance systems can effectively support navigation in unfamiliar environments.