Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper describes the use of research tools that examined challenges of American older adults involved in behind-the-counter (BhC) work. The study investigated human-environment interactions in BhC Workspaces and learned about environmental fit or how the capacity of a person combines with environmental demands to determine performance in a given situation. Three sequential research tools trace study, marginal participant observation and user interviews, were employed to evaluate four types of BhC workspaces—library circulation counter, hotel check-in counter, airport check-in counter and office reception counter. The interdependent, sequential cycle of adoption of these tools offered important means to learn about worker needs in BhC work, identify environmental problems and develop inclusive design solutions that offer safety, prevent injury, and prolong work-life. The multi-pronged approach helped develop information about BhC work and confirm interdependent methods.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bellotti

Smith

(2000, August). Informing the design of an information management system with iterative fieldwork. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 227-237). ACM.

Brown

(2009). Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.

Brown

Perkins

Brown

(2003). Place Attachment in a Revitalizing Neighborhood: Individual and Block Level Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, No. 3: 259-271.

International Labour Organisation. (2006). Changing patterns in the world of work. Proceedings of the International Labour Conference, Report 1(C): 22. Retrieved February 21, 2013 from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc95/pdf/rep-i-c.pdf

Kar

Mullick

RESNA Annual Conference

2012. Retrieved February 21, 2013 from http://web.resna.org/conference/proceedings/2012/JobEnviromentalAccommodations/LearningfromPeople.html

McClelland

(1984). Evaluation trials and the use of subjects. In, Contemporary Ergonomics. Proceedings of the 1984 Ergonomics Society Annual Conference. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Meister

(1986). Human factors testing and evaluation (Vol. 5). Elsevier.

Mitra

(2002). A century of change: the U.S. Labor Force 1950–2050, Monthly Labor Review,15-28.

Moser

Corroyer . (2001) Politeness in the Urban Environment: Is City Life Still Synonymous with Civility? Environment and Behaviour 33. No. 5: 611-625.

10.

Mullick

Agarwal

Swarnkar

Kumar

(2011). Public Bathroom for Universal Access: An Article. The Trellis. (2) 07, 121-122.

11.

Passini

Rainville

Marchand

Yves

(1998). Wayfinding & Dementia: Some Recent Research Findings and a New Look at Design, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 15. No. 2: 133 – 151.

12.

Saegert

Winkel

Swartz

(2002). Social capital and Crime in New York City’s Low-Income Housing. Housing Policy Debate 13, No.1: Fannie Mae Foundation.

13.

Sanders

E. B. N.

(2002). From user-centered to participatory design approaches. Design and the social sciences: Making connections, 1-8.

14.

Schuler

Namioka

(Eds.). (1993). System. Participatory design: Principles and practices. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

15.

Steinfeld

Danford

G.S.

(1997). Measuring “Fit” between Individual and Environment, Annual Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Environmental Design, pp. 485-489(5)

16.

Underhill

(2000). Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping. New York. Simon & Schuster.

17.

Zeisel

(2006) Inquiry by design: Environment/Behaviour/Neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape and Planning (pp.191-201). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

People,Places and Potentialities in Design – Research Tools to Examine Challenges in Behind-the-Counter Work

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References