Practicing Relevant Skills in the Classroom

Abstract

A particular challenge to professors of human factors/ergonomics courses in academia is to make their syllabi and course contents relevant to the demands placed on graduates from human factors programs as they enter the labor market. Recent surveys suggest that academic curricula indeed fall short of expectations in several critical areas. To respond to these challenges and the demonstrated deficiencies, a panel of human factors professionals from various areas in the industry suggested ways to incorporate relevant skills exercises in academic curricula. This panel is part of an ongoing dialog between employers of human factors/ergonomics professionals in the industry and the professors of human factors students in academia.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annett

(2010). Hierarchical task analysis. In Hollnagel

(Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Task Design (pp. 17–36). CRC Press.

Endsley

M. R.

Bolte

Jones

D. G.

(2003). Designing for Situation Awareness. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Rantanen

E. M.

Moroney

W. F.

(2011). Educational and skill needs for new human factors/ergonomics professionals. Proc 55th HFES Annual Meeting (pp. 530-534). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

Rantanen

E. M.

Moroney

W. F.

(2012). Employers’ expectations for education and skills of new human factors/ergonomics professionals. Proc. 56th HFES Annual Meeting (581-585). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.