Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this period of technological innovations, there is no doubt that the study of technology acceptance and diffusion is important. There have been numerous advancements in this regard. However, there has been relatively little cross-cultural research done in this domain. The purpose of this study is to explore the role that cultural differences play in the acceptance of technology and in particular, a popular email service provider, Gmail©. A mixed methods approach was followed for this study. Data regarding perception of Gmail© between participants in India (collectivist) and the U.S. (individualistic) was collected using online questionnaires. Correlational analysis and content analysis were used to analyze the data. While there was no statistical significance regarding ease of use, content analysis found that ‘ease of use’ could be an important factor for the Indian sample. Difference in loyalty towards Gmail© was found to be approaching significance (at α=0.05). ‘Ease of acquiring’ was found to be important for the acceptance of technology for both cultures studied implying that designers and producers must make it easy for potential users from any country to get their product. An interesting trend noticed was that the Indian sample identified social factors like the chat system Gtalk©, if Gmail© was exciting, and if it was good when they compared it to other systems, while the U.S. sample seemed to find work-related factors, like if it was integrated across multiple platforms or if it was a requirement with the organization, to be important. The U.S. sample also brought up the price and brand name a lot more than the Indian sample.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allwood

(1990). On the role of cultural content and cultural context in language instruction. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.

Anderson

Srinivasan

(2003). E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework. Psychology and Marketing, 20(2), (pp123–138) Wiley Periodicals.

Davis

Bagozzi

Warshaw

(1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 982–1003.

Evers

Day

(1997). The role of culture in interface acceptance. In Howard

Howard

Lindegaard

(Ed), Human Computer Interaction pp 260–267, Chapman & Hall.

Hofstede

(1984, 2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations: Sage Pubns.

Jhangiani

(2006). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Cell Phone Interface Design Preferences from the Perspective of Nationality and Disability. Citeseer..

Lam

Lee

(2005). The Influence Of Cultural Values On Brand Loyalty. ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Consumer Behavior. pp 163–271.

Lee

(2000). Adapting Triandis's model of subjective culture and social behavior relations to consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 117–126.

Robinson

W.S.

1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am. Soc. Rev. 15: 15–357.

10.

Rogers

(1962). Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York.

11.

Sinha

Verma

Sinha

(2001). Collectivism coexisting with individualism: An Indian scenario. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4(2), 133–145.

12.

Straub

Keil

Brenner

(1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management, 33(1), 1–11.

13.

T.H.

Raman

K.S.

Watson

R.T.

(1989), Group decision support systems: The cultural factor, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual International Conference on Information Systems, Boston, pp. 119–129.

14.

Triandis

Bontempo

Betancourt

Bond

Leung

Brenes

, (1986). The measurement of the etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38(3), 257–267.

15.

Triandis

Bontempo

Villareal

Asai

Lucca

(1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(2), 323–338.

16.

Venkatesh

Davis

(2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 186–204.

17.

Venkatesh

Morris

Davis

(2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.

18.

Zakaria

(2008). The post-American world: WW Norton. New York.

19.

Zakour

(2004). Cultural differences and information technology acceptance. Southern Association for Information Systems. (pp 163–171).

A Pilot Study on the Cross-Cultural Acceptance of Technology

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References