Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Emotional reactions are increasingly recognized as an important part of experiences with technology, and there is a need for rigorous investigation into the collection of self-reported emotional data. We examine the capture of continuous, quantitative, affective self-reports as a complement to existing methods of evaluating human-system or product interaction. This experiment investigated 12 participants' use of a single slider (for valence, from very negative to very positive) and two sliders (for valence and arousal) in response to approximately 45 minutes of a nature video. Individual differences and physiological data (heart rate variability and skin conductance) were recorded. Emotion ratings were significantly related to skin conductance, which both differed significantly across chapters with different video content. We observed a learning effect, where participants' response times to probe questions decreased across blocks. Cognitive load appeared higher in the two-slider condition, with a possibly larger learning effect, and significantly longer dwell times, when compared to one slider. Arousal self-ratings were contradicted by skin conductance measures. We conclude with recommendations concerning the use of sliders for assessment of emotional user experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bar-On

(1997). The BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

Champney

Stanney

(2007). Using Emotions in Usability. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 51st Annual Meeting. (Baltimore, USA, Oct 1–5), 1044–1049.

Conway

Engle

(1996). Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, 4, 577–590.

Damasio

(1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Grossett/Putnam & Sons.

Desmet

(2003). Measuring emotion: Development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In Blythe

M. A.

Monk

A. F.

Overbeeke

Wright

P.C.

(Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment (pp. 111–123). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.

Francis

Neath

MacKewn

Goldwaite

(2004). Coglab on a CD. Belmont CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Hager

J. C.

Ekman

(1983). The inner and outer meanings of facial expressions. In Cacioppo

Petty

(Eds.), Social Psychophysiology (pp. 287–306). New York: Gilford Press.

Hancock

P. A.

Pepe

Murphy

L.L.

(2005). Hedonomics: The power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics, Ergonomics in Design, 13 (1), 8–14.

Hazlett

R. L.

(2006). Measuring emotional valence during interactive experiences: boys at video game play. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22 – 27, 2006). Grinter

Rodden

Aoki

Cutrell

Jeffries

Olson

, Eds. CHI ′06. ACM, New York, NY, 1023–1026.

10.

Hutcherson

C.A.

Goldin

P.R.

Ochsner

K.N.

Gabrieli

J.D.

Feldman Barret

Gross

J.J.

(2005) Attention and emotion: Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films? NeuroImage 27, 656–668.

11.

Jordan

P.W.

(1997). The four pleasures: Taking human factors beyond usability, In Proc. Int'l Erg. Assoc. 2, 364–6.

12.

Kahneman

(1999). Objective happiness. In Kahneman

Diener

Schwarz

(Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

13.

Lang

(1995). The Emotion Probe: Studies of Motivation and Attention, American Psychologist 50, 5, 372–385.

14.

Laurens

Desmet

(2008). Designing a research tool: A case-study in how design and research can cross-fertilize each other, In: DRS2008 Design Research Society Biennial Conference, pp.362(1)–362(10). DRS digital archive.

15.

Lottridge

Chignell

(2009a). Emotrace: Tracing Emotions through Human-System Interaction, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting HFES 2009, 5 pgs.

16.

Lottridge

Chignell

(2009b) Emotional Bandwidth: Information Theory Analysis of Affective Response Ratings Using a Continuous Slider, Proc. 12th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 2009, 111–114.

17.

Mandryk

R. L.

Inkpen

K. M.

(2004). Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chicago, Illinois, USA, November 06 – 10, 2004). CSCW ′04. ACM, New York, NY, 102–111.

18.

Mauss

I. B.

Levenson

R. W.

McCarter

Wilhelm

F. H.

Gross

J. J.

(2005). The tie that binds? Coherence among emotional experience, behavior, and autonomic physiology. Emotion, 5, 175–190.

19.

Norman

(2005). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, New York: Basic Books.

20.

Ranjan

Birnholtz

Balakrishnan

(2008). Improving meeting capture by applying television production principles with audio and motion detection. In Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 05 – 10, 2008). CHI ′08. ACM, New York, NY, 227–236.

21.

Ruef

A. M.

Levenson

R. W.

(2007). Continuous Measurement of Emotion: The Affect Rating Dial, In Coan

Allen

(Eds.), Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (pp 286–297) New York: Oxford University Press.

22.

Rottenberg

Ray

Gross

(2007). Emotion Elicitation Using Video. In Coan

Allen

(Eds.), Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, (pp 9–28) New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

Russell

J.A.

(1980). A circumplex model of affect Journal of Personality and Social Psych 39, 1161–1178.

24.

Zajonc

R. B.

(1980). Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

Sliders Rate Valence but not Arousal: Psychometrics of Self-Reported Emotion Assessment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References