Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Previous research has shown that search and rescue robots get stuck. We ask why. Perhaps operators attempt to drive through apertures larger than the robot, but too small to be driven through unhindered. If this is the case, then operators should base their decisions to enter apertures on their ability to drive the robot instead of other physical dimensions. This assumes that operators are cognizant of their abilities to drive the robot through the aperture. To test this assumption, participants viewed an image transmitted from a camera mounted on a robot and drove towards apertures of varying width. Half of the participants judged whether the robot could pass through, half judged whether they could drive the robot through. Finally, all participants attempted to drive the robot through the aperture. Results indicated that pass-ability judgments were accurate, but drive-ability judgments were not. Implications for training and interface design are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

Casey

Keyes

Yanco

H.A.

(2004). Improved Interfaces for Human-Robot Interaction in an Urban Search and Rescue Task, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, October 2004.

Burke

J.L.

Murphy

R.R.

Coovert

M.D.

Riddle

D.L.

(2004). Moonlight in Miami; field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Human Computer Interaction, 19 (1), 85–116.

Burke

J.L.

Murphy

R.R.

Rogers

Lumelsky

V.J.

Scholtz

(2004). Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction. IEEE transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C-Applications and Reviews, 34 (2), 103–112.

Casper

(2002). Human-Robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center. Masters Thesis, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of South Florida.

Cumming

Finch

(2005). Inference by eye. American Psychologist, 60 (2), 170–180.

Ishak

Adolph

K.E.

Lin

G.C.

(2008). Perceiving affordances for fitting through apertures. Journal of Experimental Psychology- Human Perception and Performance. 34 (6), 1501–1514.

Jones

K.S.

Johnson

B.R.

(2008). Why do tele-operated robots get stuck? Paper presented at the Texas Regional Human Factors and Ergonomics One Day Conference, Austin, TX.

Keyes

(2007). Evolution of a telepresence robot interface. Unpublished Master's, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.

Keyes

Casey

Yanco

H.A.

Maxwell

B.A.

Georgiev

(2006). Camera placement and multi-camera fusion for remote robot operation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, August 22–24.

10.

Moore

K.S.

Gomer

J.A.

Pagano

C.C.

D.D.

(2009). Perception of robot passability during direct line of sight and teleoperation Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 51 (4), 557–570.

11.

Moore

K.S.

Gomer

J.A.

Bulter

S.N.

Pagano

C.C.

(2007). Perception of robot passability and aperture width during direct line of sight and teleoperation conditions. Proceedings of the HFES 51st annual meeting, 1076–1080.

12.

Moore

K.S.

Pagano

C.C.

(2006). Can humans perceive affordances for teleoperated robots? Poster presented at the North American Meeting of the International Society for Ecological Psychology, Cincinnati. OH, (June 22–24), 2006.

13.

Murphy

(2004). Activities of the rescue robots at the World Trade Center. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 11–21, pp. 50–61.

14.

Wagman

J.B.

Malek

E.A.

(2009). Geometric, kinetic-kinematic, and intentional constraints influence willingness to pass under a barrier. Experimental Psychology, 56 (6), 409–417.

15.

Warren

W.H.

(1984). Perceiving affordances — Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology — Human Perception and Performance. 10 (5), 683–703.

16.

Warren

W.H.

Whang

(1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13 (3), 371–383.

17.

Woodworth

R.S.

Schlosberg

(1954). Experimental Psychology, New York: Holt.

18.

Yanco

H.A.

Drury

J.L.

(2002) Rescuing interfaces: A multi-year study of human-robot interaction at the AAAI robot rescue competition, Autonomous Robots, 22(4), 333–352.

19.

Yanco

H.A.

Drury

(2004). “Where am I?” Acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, October 2004. Yanco, H.A., Keyes, B., Drury, J.L., Nielsen, C.W., Few, D.A., 7 Bruemmer, D.J. (2007). Evolving interface design for robot search tasks. Journal of Field Robotics, 24(8–9), 779–799.

Tele-Operation Through Apertures: Mission Impassable or Mission Undrivable?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References