Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In many modern environments noise is a pervasive and influential source of stress. Whether it is the acute result of impulse noise or the chronic effects of prolonged exposure to active machinery the challenge of noise faces many who must accomplish vital performance duties. While noise can have diffuse effects which are shared in common with any chronic form of stress, its influence can also vary as a function of the characteristics of the task and of the noise itself. Here, we provide a quantitative evaluation of those influences so that their most harmful effects can be mitigated, their most beneficial effects exploited and any residual effects incorporated and synthesized into selection, training and design strategies to facilitate human performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Breen-Lewis

Wilding

(1984). Noise, time of day and test expectations in recall and recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 75 (1), 51–63.

Broadbent

D. E.

(1978). The current state of noise research: Reply to Poulton. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1052–1067.

Campbell

Beaman

C. P.

Berry

D. C.

(2002). Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory, 10 (3), 199–214.

Conway

Szalma

J.L.

Hancock

P.A.

(2007). A quantitative meta-analytic examination of whole-body vibration effects on human performance. Ergonomics, 50, 228–245.

Davies

A. D.

Davies

D. R.

(1975). The effects of noise and time of day upon age differences in performance at two checking tasks. Ergonomics, 18 (3), 321–336.

Hancock

P. A.

Warm

J.S.

(1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519–537.

Hancock

P. A.

Ganey

H. C. N.

(2003). From the inverted-U to the extended-U: The evolution of a law of psychology. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 7, 5–14.

Hancock

P. A.

Ross

J.M.

Szalma

J.L.

(2007). A meta-analysis of performance response under thermal stressors. Human Factors, 49, 851–877.

Helton

W. S.

Warm

J.S.

Matthews

Corcoran

K.J.

Dember

W.N.

(2002). Further tests of an abbreviated vigilance task: Effects of signal salience and jet aircraft noise on performance and stress. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46, 1546–1550.

10.

Hockey

G. R. J.

(1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive — energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73–93.

11.

Hockey

(1984). Varieties of attentional state: The effects of environment. In Davies

D. R.

(Ed.), Varieties of attention (pp. 449–483). New York: Academic Press.

12.

Hunter

J. E.

Schmidt

F. L.

(2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Loeb

(1986). Noise and human efficiency. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

14.

Poulton

E. C.

(1977). Continuous intense noise masks auditory feedback and inner speech. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 977–1001.

15.

Poulton

E. C.

(1978). A new look at the effects of noise: A rejoinder. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1068–1079.

16.

Poulton

E. C.

(1979). Composite model for human performance in continuous noise. Psychological Review, 86, 361–375.

17.

Van Gemmert

A. W. A.

Van Galen

G. P.

(1997). Stress, neuromotor noise, and human performance: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23 (5), 1299–1313.

A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Noise on Performance: Moderating Effects of Task and Noise Characteristics

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References