Although a nurse's job is inundated with prospective memory (PM) demands, and studies show that PM failures are a key component of adverse medical events, only one study has examined prospective memory in nursing (Grundgeiger, Sanderson, MacDougall, & Venkatesh, 2009). The purpose of the current study was to complement existing research with self-reports from 25 nurses on the PM tasks they must remember and those they forget. Results revealed that nurses most frequently perform episodic tasks, and these tasks can be further classified to better explain when nursing PM demands arise and what the demands consist of. A more specific categorization of nursing PM tasks enables researchers to focus on specific design solutions. We provide examples of such re-design recommendations intended to alleviate PM demands.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshJ.MarcB.CoieraE. (2004). Some unitended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11 (2), 104–112.
2.
BalasM.ScottL.RogerA. (2004). The prevalence and nature of errors and reported by hospital staff nurses. Applied Nursing Research, 17 (4), 224–230.
3.
CarayonP.SmithM. (2000). Work organization and ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 649–662.
4.
CarayonP.AlvaradoC. J.HundtA. S. (2007). Work design and patient safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8 (5), 395–428.
5.
CardonaP.TappenR.TerrillM.AcostaM.EusebeM. (1997). Nursing staff time allocation in long-term care: A work sampling study. Journal of Nursing Administration, 27 (2), 28–36.
6.
DieckmannP.ReddersenS.WehnerT.RallM. (2006). Prospective memory failures as an unexplored threat to patient safety: Results from a pilot study using patient simulators to investigate the missed execution of intentions. Ergonomics, 49 (5), 526–543.
7.
DiekmanP.DyrlovM.ReddersenS.RallM.WehnerT. (2009). Remembering to do things later and resuming interrupted tasks: Prospective memory and patient safety. In: FlinR.MitchellL. eds. Sager Surgery: Analysing Behavior in the Operating Theatre Surray: Ashgate, 339–352.
8.
DismukesR.NowinskiJ. (2007). Prospective memory, concurrent task management, and pilot error. In KramerA.WiegmanD.KirlikA. (Eds), Attention: From Theory to Practice. New York: Oxford.
9.
EbrightP.PattersonE.ChalkoB.RenderM. (2003). Understanding the complexity of registered nurse work in acute care settings. JONA, 33 (12), 630–638.
10.
EinsteinG.McDanielM. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717–726.
11.
GrundgeigerT.LiuD.SandersonP.JenkinsS.LeaneT. (2008). Effects of interruptions on prospective memory performance in anesthesiology. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting, 808–812.
12.
GrundgeigerT.SandersonP. (2009). Interruptions in healthcare: Theoretical views. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 293–307.
13.
GrundgeigerT.SandersonP.MacDougallH.VenkateshB. (2009). Distributed prospective memory: An approach to understanding how nurses remember tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53nd Annual Meeting, 759–763.
JohnstoneM.Kanitsaki (2006). The ethics and practical importance of defining, distinguishing, and disclosing nursing errors: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43 (3), 367–377.
16.
LeapeL. (1994). Error in medicine. JAMA, 272 (23), 1851–1857.
17.
LeapeL. (2002). Patient safety: Reporting of adverse events. New England Journal of Medicine, 347 (20), 1633–1638.
18.
MorrowD. G.NorthR.WickensC. D. (2006). Reducing and mitigating human error in medicine. In NickersonR.S. (Ed.), Annual review of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 1, pp. 254–296). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
19.
NormanD.The Design of Everyday Things, Currency Doubleday, 1988.
20.
ReasonJ. (2000). Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal, 320, 768–770.
21.
RothschildJ.LandriganC.CroninJ.KaushalR.LockleyS.BurdickE. (2005). The critical care safety study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Critical Care Medicine, 33 (8), 1694–1700.
22.
ThompsonD.BurnsH. (2004). Work environment for nurses and the impact on protecting patients from health care errors. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20 (3), 145–146.
23.
TuckerA.SpearS. (2006). Operational failures and interruptions in hospital nursing (Part 1). HSR: Health Services Research, 41 (3), 643–662.
24.
WolfLPotterP.SledgeJ.BowermanS.GraysonD.EvanoffB. (2006). Describing Nurses' Work: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis. Human Factors, 48 (1), 5–14.
