This investigation explored differences in armored vehicle recognition training by supplying 2D images of 3D models at different views. Additionally, the relationship between the spatial construct of closure speed and target identification was examined. Participants were administered three tests of closure speed, and then trained on armored vehicle recognition with 2D images of 3D models at more angles than typically given with line drawings supplied to soldiers. Results did not show a significant difference between the training conditions on a tank recognition task. Examining the relationship between performance on closure speed tests and tank recognition performance scores showed mixed results. Implications of this research may include considerations for selection and training of future unmanned vehicle operators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiedermanI. (1987). Recognition by components theory: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94 (2), 115–147.
2.
BiedermanI.CooperE.E. (1987). Battlefield recognition of armored vehicles. Human Factors, 37 (3), 596–610.
3.
BiedermanIShiffrarM. M. (1987). Sexing day old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13 (4), 640–645.
4.
BriggsRalph W.GoldbergJoseph H. (1995). Battlefield recognition of armored vehicles. Human Factors, 37 (3), 596–610.
5.
CarrollJ.L.MurphyR.R. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor Analytical Studies.New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ChenJ.DurlachP.SloanJ.BowensL. (2008). Human robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. Military Psychology, 20, 135–149.
7.
ChenJ.TerranceP. (in press). Effects of imperfect automation and individual differences on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulation multitasking environment.
8.
CrumleyL.PierceL.SchwalmR.CokeJ.BrownJ. (1992). Predicting target detection performance using the armed services vocational aptitude battery subtests and cognitive factor tests. U.S. Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD-A257 851).
9.
EkstromR.FrenchJ.HarmanH. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests.Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
10.
FincannonTEvansA.W.IIIJentschFKeeblerJ. (2008). Interactive effects of backup behavior and spatial abilities in the prediction of teammate workload using multiple unmanned vehicles. Proceeding of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 995–999.
11.
FincannonT.EvansA.W.IIIJentschF.KeeblerJ. (2009). Dimensions of spatial ability and their influence on performance with unmanned systems. In AndrewsD. H.HullT. (Eds.). Human factors in defense: Human factors in combat identification.Ashgate Publishing.
12.
HammeL.WassermanE. A.BiedermanI. (1992). Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18 (4), 387–399.
13.
KeeblerJ. R.Harper-SciariniM.CurtisM.SchusterD.JentschF.Bell-CarrollM. (2007). Effects of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional media exposure training on a tank recognition task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 51st annual meeting, Baltimore, MD.
14.
Kirkpatrick-StegerK.BrownUWassermanE. A.BiedermanI. (1997) Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24(1), 34–46.
15.
OsoskyS.EvansA. W.IIIKeeblerJ.JentschF. (2007). Using scale simulation and virtual environments to study human-robot teams. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of Augmented Cognition International, 4, 183–18.
16.
PezdekK.MakiR.Valencia-LaverD.WhetstoneT.StoeckertJ. (1988). Picture memory: Recognizing added and deleted details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 468–476.
17.
PiernoA.CariaA.CastielloU. (2004). Comparing effects of 2-D and 3-D visual cues during aurally aided target acquisition. Human Factors, 46 (4), 728–737.
18.
RockI.HalperF.ClaytonT. (1972). The perception and recognition of complex figures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 655–673.
19.
SchusterD.FincannonT.JentschF.KeeblerJ.EvansA. W.III (2008). The role of spatial ability in the relationship between video game experience and route effectiveness among unmanned vehicle operators [Electronic version]. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Army Science Conference.
