Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many accessibility problems of devices and user interfaces could be avoided if the needs of people with disabilities were considered during the design process. This paper describes an accessibility experience lab module which introduces participants to both the barriers associated with disabilities and the impact that simple design changes can have on those barriers. The core of the lab is an experience session where participants are given functional limitations along with tasks at paired stations so they can compare their experiences on devices with inaccessible and accessible designs. For seven years the experience lab has been a part of the curriculum for first-year engineering students at the University of Wisconsin, and over 1700 students have completed it. In the popular lab, the students are engaged and report interest and insights into design for disabilities. Materials are available at www.trace.wisc.edu/training/explab/.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Behler

G. T.

(1993). Disability simulations as a teaching tool: Some ethical issues and implications. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 10 (2), 3–8.

Brew-Parrish

(2004 August 9). The wrong message still. Ragged Edge Online. Retrieved February 22, 2010 from http://www.raggededgemagazine.com/focus/wrongmessage04.html.

Burgstahler

Doe

(2004). Disability-related simulations: If, when, and how to use them in professional development. Review of Disability Studies, 1 (2), 4–18.

Clark

M. C.

Foos

P. W.

Faucher

M. H.

(1995). You can touch this: Simulation exercises for aging and disability. Educational Gerontology, 21 (7), 643–651.

Dym

C. L.

Agogino

A. M.

Frey

D. D.

Leifer

L. J.

(2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103–120.

Eames

(2003 December 11). Fresno official awareness: When simulations work. Ragged Edge Online. Retrieved February 22, 2010 from http://www.raggededgemagazine.com/extra/eamesawareday1103.html.

Elliot

T. R.

Byrd

E. K.

(1982). Media and Disability. Rehabilitation Literature, 43, 348–355.

Engelke

C. R.

“Imagining Ability: Interaction and Perspective Taking in Assistive Technology Design.” Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association. Philadelphia, Penn. 3 Dec. 2009.

Flower

Burns

M. K.

Bottsford-Miller

N. A.

(2007). Meta-analysis of disability simulation research. Remedial and Special Education, 28 (2), 72–79.

10.

French

(1992). Simulation exercises in disability awareness training: A critique. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, 257–266.

11.

Karraker

M. W.

(1993). Mock trials and critical thinking. College Teaching, 41 (4), 134–137.

12.

Kiger

(1992). Disability simulations: Logical, methodological and ethical issues. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, 71–78.

13.

McGowan

J. P.

(1999). The effects of disability simulations on attitudes toward persons with disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Seton Hall University, South Orange, N.J. Retrieved from database at http://academic.shu.edu/libraries/db/disslist.htm.

14.

Pfeiffer

(1989). Disability simulation using a wheelchair exercise. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 7, 53–60.

15.

Scullion

(1996). Quasidisability experiences using simulation. British journal of therapy and rehabilitation, 3, 498–502.

16.

Smart

(2001). Disability, society, and the individual. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.

17.

Smith

J. W.

(1997 April). Disability simulation that works. The Braille Monitor, 40(4). Retrieved February 22, 2010 from http://nfb.org/legacy/bm/bm97/Bm970411.htm.

18.

Stephanidis

Salvendy

Akoumianakis

Bevan

Brewer

Emiliani

P. L.

Galetsas

(1998). Toward an information society for all: An international research and development agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10 (2), 107–134.

19.

Swain

Lawrence

(1994). Learning about disability: Changing attitudes or challenging understanding? In French

(Ed.), On equal terms: working with disabled people (pp. 87–102). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

20.

Universal design principles (1997). Retrieved February 22, 2010, from the National Center for Universal Design web site: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/udprinciples.htm.

21.

Vanderheiden

G. C.

(2006) Design for people with functional limitations. In Salvendy

(Ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (3rd ed.; pp. 1386–1417). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.

22.

Wurst

S. A.

Wolford

(1994). Integrating disability awareness into psychology courses: Applications in abnormal psychology and perception. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 233–235.

Accessibility Experience Lab: Discovering the Impact of Design on Disabilities

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References