In this paper we describe the design of a new experimental research platform to study human decision-making in command and control environments. NeoCITIES is a scaled worlds simulation of emergency dispatcher interaction. This paper describes the most recent enhancements to the NeoCITIES Simulation, now available in version 3.0. As a research platform NeoCITIES 3.0 provides a reliable scoring model for evaluating human task performance and an extensive modular graphical user interface for the investigation of cognitive aids. NeoCITIES was developed to study the effectiveness of cognitive artifacts within a simulated command and control environment in a simulated extreme events scenario.
EndsleyM. R. (1988). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Paper presented at the Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1988. NAECON 1988., Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National.
4.
EndsleyM. R. (2000). Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness: A Critical Review. In EndsleyM. R.GarlandD. J. (Eds.), Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement (pp. 24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
EntinE. E.EntinE. B. (2001). Measures for Evaluation of Team Processes and Performance in Experiments and Exercises. Proceedings of the 6th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Annapolis, Maryland June, 19–21.
6.
HellarD.B.HallD. (2009). NeoCITIES: an experimental test-bed for quantifying the effects of cognitive aids on team performance in C2 situations. SPIE Modeling and Simulation for Military Operations IV, Orlando Florida.
7.
JeffersonT.FerzandiL.McNeeseM. (2004). Impact of Hidden Profiles on Distributed Cognition in Spatially Distributed Decision-Making Teams. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, pp. 649–652(4).
8.
McNeeseM. D.BainsBrewerI.BrownConnorsE. S.JeffersonJ. T. (2005). The Neocities simulation: Understanding the design and experimental methodology used to develop a team emergency management simulation. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual meeting, Orlando, FL.
9.
McNeeseM. D.PerusichK.RentschJ. (1999). What is command and control coming to? Examining sociocognitive mediators that expand the common ground of teamwork. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 43 rd, Houston, TX, 209–212.
10.
MohammedS.HoultR.HamiltonK.MinotraD.HellarB.McNeeseM. (July, 2009). Time and team mental models: Towards greater integration of temporal dynamics. In RicoR. (Chair), New trends in team coordination: Knowledge, understanding, timing, and structure. A symposium presented to the Fourth Annual Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research (INGRoup) conference, Colorado Springs, CO.
11.
ObietaJ. F. (2006). Scenarios for crisis management simulations. Unpublished Masters dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
12.
PfaffM. S. (2009). Emotional conversations in command and control: The impact of mood and stress on computer-mediated team communication behaviors. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Antonio, TX, 414–418.
13.
TerrellI. S. (2006). Understanding 911 dispatch teams across context: implications for theory, information technology, and practice. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
14.
WellensA. R.ErgenerD. (1988). The C.I.T.I.E.S. game: A computer based situation assessment task for studying distributed decision making. Simulation & Games, 19(3), 304–327.
