This research investigated an observer's ability to track and maintain multiple uniquely identified objects in a dynamic environment similar to ATC. The experimental task consisted of tracking a set of moving objects for twenty seconds. The objects were 6-character strings; three letters followed by three numbers. After tracking the objects for twenty seconds, the participants were instructed to locate a target-object. The time required to find the target object was recorded. The number of objects and the magnitude of direction changes (entropy) were manipulated. We found (1) a highly significant effect of increasing response times as a function of number of objects, (2) a marginally significant effect of entropy, decreasing response times as a function of entropy, and (3) a significant effect of displacement, increasing response times as a function of objects' displacement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvarezG.CavanaghP. (2005). Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science, 16(8), 637–643.
2.
BatesD.MaechlerM.DaiB. (2008). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using s4 classes [Computer software manual]. Available from http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/(R package version 0.999375–28).
3.
BundesenC. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547.
4.
BundesenC.HabekostT.KyllingsbaekS. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112, 291–328.
5.
CarmodyM.GluckmanJ. (1993). Task specific effects of automation and automation failure on performance, workload, and situation awareness. In JensenR.NeumeisterD. (Eds.), (p. 167–171). Columbus, OH: Department of Aviation, The Ohio State University.
6.
CavanaghP.AlvarezG. (2005). Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
7.
CharltonS. G.O'brienT. G. (2002). Handbook of human factors testing and evaluation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
DiggleP. J. (1983). Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. New York, New York: Academic Press.
9.
EndsleyM.GarlandD. (2000). Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, New Jersey.
10.
EndsleyM.JonesD. (1996). Situation awareness in air traffic control. In SalvendyA. O. G. (Ed.), Advances in applied ergonomics. proceedings of the first international conference of applied ergonomics (p. 394–397). West Lafayette, IN: USA Publishing.
11.
EndsleyM.KirisE. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem of level and control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2), 381–394.
12.
EndsleyM.MogfordR.AllendoerferK.SnyderM.SteinE. (1997). Effect of free flight conditions on controller performance, workload, and situation awareness (dot/faa/ct-tn97/12) (Tech. Rep.). Atlantic City International Airport: Fedral Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center.
13.
EndsleyM.RodgersM. (1996). Attention distribution and situational awareness in air traffic control. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 82–85.
14.
FinkeR. A.ShyiG. C.-W. (1988). Mental extrapolation and representational momentum for complex implied motions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 112–120.
15.
FreydJ. J.FinkeR. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 126–132.
16.
HopeR. M. (2009). The predictive utility of the model of multiple identity tracking in air traffic control performance. Master's thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology. Retrieved from RIT Digital Media Library. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1858/18642.
17.
HumphreysG.GilchristI.FreeL. (1996). Search and selection in human vision: Physiological evidence and computational implications. In Visual attention and cognition (p. 79–93). Elsevier Science.
18.
IglewiczS.HoaglinD. (1993). How to detect and handle outliers. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.
19.
KeaneB. P.PylyshynZ. W. (2006). Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 346–368.
20.
LoganD. (1996). The code theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103(4), 603–649.
21.
LoganD. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376–400.
22.
MetzgerU.ParasuramanR. (2001). The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: An empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring. Human Factors, 43(4).
23.
MogfordR. (1997). Mental models and situation awareness in air traffic control. The international journal of aviation psychology, 7(4), 331–341.
24.
OksamaL.HyonaJ. (2008). Dynamic binding of identity and location information: A serial model of multiple identity tracking. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 237–283.
25.
PylyshynZ.AnnanV. (2006). Dynamics of target selection in multiple object tracking (mot). Spatial Vision, 19(6), 485–504.
26.
PylyshynZ.StormR. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179–197.
27.
R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.R-project.org (ISBN 3-900051-07-0).
28.
ShannonC. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656.
29.
TheeuwesJ. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799806.
30.
WickensMavor A. S.McGeeJ. (1997). Flight to the future: human factors in air traffic control. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
31.
WickensMavorA. S.ParasuramanR.McGeeJ. (1998). The future of air traffic control: human operators and automation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
