This paper discusses the use of magnitude estimation, a method with roots in psychophysics, as a tool for evaluating user experience. Using two healthcare-related case studies for illustration, we describe the advantages and disadvantages of applying this method, relative to more traditional ranking and rating scales. We also discuss lessons learned and provide recommendations for researchers considering the use of magnitude estimation to evaluate user experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HartleyA. A. (1977). Mental measurement in the magnitude estimation of length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 622–628.
2.
HellierE. J.EdworthyJ.DennisI. (1993). Improving auditory warning design: Quantifying and predicting the effects of different warning parameters on perceived urgency. Human Factors, 35, 693–706.
3.
McGeeM. (2003). Usability magnitude estimation. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Denver, CO.
4.
SauroJ.DumasJ. (2009). Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability questionnaires. In Proceedings of the 2009 Meeting of Computer-Human Interaction (CHI). Boston, MA.
5.
StevensS. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.
6.
StevensS. S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects. New York: Wiley.
7.
TedescoD.TullisT. (2006). A comparison of methods for eliciting post-task subjective ratings in usability testing. In Proceedings of the 2006 meeting of the Usability Professionals Association. Denver, CO.
8.
TullisT.AlbertB. (2008). Measuring the User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann.
