A forensic case study is presented in which an automobile collided with a wheelchair at night. Analyses determined that the combination of low visual contrast of the wheelchair and driver against the nighttime background, the poor illumination on the street, and the probable, and erroneous, expectation of the wheelchair driver that he was visible to the automobile driver and therefore could safely cross the street, caused this collision and injury. An analysis of NEISS data conservatively estimated that almost 900 collisions of motor vehicles and wheelchairs occur each year in the United States. There currently are no federal regulations to enhance conspicuity of wheelchairs as there are regulations to enhance the conspicuity of bicycles. Such regulations are needed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallK.K.BeardB.L.RoenkerD.L.MillerR.L.GriggsD.S. (1988), Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of View. J. Optical Society of America, 5, 2210–2219.
DevivoM.J.KrauseJ.S.LammertseD.P. (1999). Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80 (11), 1411–1419.
HancockP.A.WulfG.ThomD.FassnachtP. (1990). Driver workload during differing driving maneuvers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 22 (3), 281–290.
7.
HigginsK.E.JaffeM.J.CarusoR.C.DemonasterioF.M. (1988). Spatial contrast sensitivity: Effects of age, test-retest, and psychophysical method. J. Optical Society of America, 5, 2173–2180.
8.
HughesP.K.ColeB.L. (1986). Can the conspicuity of objects be predicted from laboratory experiments?Ergonomics, 29 (9), 1097–1111.
9.
IESNA Lighting Handbook, Reference Application (2000). ReaMark S., Editor-in-Chief. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America: NY.
KayeH.S.KangT.LaplanteM.P. (2000). Mobility Device Use in the United States. Disability Statistics Report 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Retrieved February 18, 2010 from http://dsc.ucsf.edu/publication.php?pub_id=2.
12.
KwanI.MapstoneJ. (2004). Visibility aids for pedestrians and cyclists: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36, 305–312.
HelmickC.G.FelsonD.T.LawrenceR.C.GabrielS.HirschR.KwohC.K.LiangM.H.KremersH.M.MayesM.D.MerkelP.A.PillemerS.R.ReveilleJ.D.StoneJ.H. (2008). Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part I. Arthritis Rheum, 58 (1), 15–25.
15.
LongG.M.CrambertR.F. (1990). The nature and basis of age-related changes in dynamic visual acuity. Psychology and Aging, 5, 138–143.
16.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Research Note (September 1997). Wheelchair Users Injuries and Deaths Associated with Motor Vehicle Related Incidents. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved February 15, 2010 from http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/ncsa/wheelchr.html.
17.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2007). Traffic safety facts 2007: Pedestrians (DOT HS 810 994). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved February 15, 2010 from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/810994.PDF.
18.
RodríguezT.MalvezziM.ChatenoudL.BosettiC.LeviF.NegriE.La VecchiaC. (2006). Trends in mortality from coronary heart and cerebrovascular diseases in the Americas: 1970–2000. Heart, 92, 453–460.
19.
ShinarD. (1984). Actual versus estimated nighttime pedestrian visibility. Ergonomics, 27 (8), 863–871.
20.
ShinarD. (1985). The effects of expectancy, clothing reflectance, and detection criterion on nighttime pedestrian visibility. Human Factors, 27 (3), 327–333.
21.
TyrrellR.A.PattonC.W.BrooksJ.O. (2004a). Educational interventions successfully reduce pedestrians' overestimates of their own nighttime visibility. Human Factors, 46 (1), 170–182.
22.
TyrrellR.A.WoodJ.M.CarberryT.P. (2004b). On-road measures of pedestrians' estimates of their own nighttime conspicuity. Journal of Safety Research, 35 (5), 483–490.
23.
WoodJ.M.BullimoreM.A. (1995). Changes in the lower displacement limit for motion with age. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 15, 31–36.
24.
WoodJ.M.TyrrellR.A.CarberryT.P. (2005). Limitations in drivers' ability to recognize pedestrians at night. Human Factors, 47, 644–653.
