Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In many corporate settings, users are required to quickly execute commands. Three methods of issuing commands were compared: 1) selecting a menu item with a mouse (Menu-Mouse condition); 2) selecting a menu item with a keyboard shortcut (Menu-Keyboard condition); and 3) selecting a toolbar item with a mouse (Toolbar-Mouse condition). Users performed one of the three methods across 90 trials and had their speed assessed in blocks of 30 trials. Overall, the Toolbar-Mouse method was the fastest, while the Menu-Keyboard condition showed the most improvement. A GOMS-based model is presented that accounts for differences among methods. This work confirms the use of toolbars for common commands, but also suggests that for heavily-used interfaces, keyboard shortcuts can be as efficient as toolbars and have the advantage of providing fast access to all commands.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Card

Moran

T. P.

Newell

(1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cockburn

Gutwin

Greenberg

(2007). A predictive model of menu performance. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI, 2007, 627–636.

Fitts

P. M.

(1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

Hick

W. E.

(1952). On the rate of gain in information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.

Hornof

A. J.

Halverson

(2003). Modeling user behavior: Cognitive strategies and eye movements for searching hierarchical computer displays. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 1903, 249–256.

Hyman

(1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 423–432.

John

B. E.

Kieras

D. E.

(1996). The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions, 3, 320–351.

Jorgensen

A. H.

Garde

A. H.

Laursen

Jensen

B. R.

(2002). Using mouse and keyboard under time pressure: Preference, strategies, and learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 317–319.

Karat

McDonald

J. E.

Anderson

(1986). A comparison of menu selection techniques: Touch panel, mouse and keyboard. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 73–88.

10.

Keppel

(1973). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

11.

Lane

D. M.

Napier

H. A.

Peres

S. C.

Sandor

(2005). Hidden costs of graphical user interfaces: Failure to make the transition from menus and icon toolbars to keyboard shortcuts. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 133–144.

12.

Medin

D. L.

Smith

E. E.

(1981). Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 241–253.

13.

Newell

Rosenbloom

P.S.

(1980). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the Law of Practice. In Anderson

J. R.

, (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition, 1–51, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Pirolli

Card

(1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643–67.

Comparison of Mouse and Keyboard Efficiency

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References