Television shows like ‘CSI’ can give the impression that matching crime-scene fingerprints is fully automated. But it is actually humans (fingerprint experts) who ultimately decide whether a crime-scene print belongs to a suspect or not. Despite this fact, there have been no published, peer-reviewed studies directly examining the extent to which experts can correctly match fingerprints to one another. In two experiments presented here we aim to determine the factors affecting accuracy using non-expert participants and test (1) whether the advantage found for the sequential presentation of faces applies to prints and (2) whether the amount of information in a print matters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BuseyT.VanderkolkJ. (2005). Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts. Vision Research, 45, 431–448.
2.
ColeS. A. (2005). More than zero: Accounting for error in latent fingerprint identification. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 95, 985–1078.
3.
ColeS. A. (2007). The fingerprint controversy. Skeptical Inquirer, 31, 41–46.
4.
Face Recognition Grand Challenge Database (2006). Retrieved 1 September 2009, from http://www.frvt.org/FRGC.
5.
HaberL.HaberR. N. (2003). Error rates for human fingerprint examiners. In RathaN. K.BolleR. M. (Eds.), Automatic fingerprint recognition systems, (339–349) New York: Springer-Verlag.
6.
LoftusE. F.ColeS. A. (2004). Contaminated evidence. Science, 304, 959.
7.
National Academy of Sciences (2009). Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forwar. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
8.
SteblayN.DysartJ.FuleroS.LindsayR. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous linup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459–473.
9.
TangenJ. M.VokeyJ. R. (submitted). Fingerprint identification: On the psychophysics of matching latents to ten-print patents. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology.
10.
VokeyJ. R.TangenJ. M.ColeS. A. (2008). On the preliminary psychophysics of fingerprint identification. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1023–1040.
