Supervision is a broad term that covers a wide range of task environments and cognitive activities. Here, we describe one specific type called multi-tasking supervision. It involves rapidly assessing a set of distinct systems or situations and determining where attention is needed moment by moment. Multi-tasking supervision is a key component of many command and control, and other, tasks. This paper focuses on understanding the cognitive needs of multi-tasking supervision and developing support concepts for it. First, we place multi-tasking supervision within the context of other types of supervision. Next, we consider the types of tasks and work environments that are appropriate for multi-tasking supervision. Finally, we discuss computer display concepts for supporting multi-tasking supervision.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmannE. M.TraftonJ. G. (2007). Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1079–1084.
2.
BardramJ. E.HansenT. R. (2004). The AWARE architecture: Supporting context-mediated social awareness in mobile cooperation. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, NY: ACM.
3.
BillingsC. E. (1997). Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
6.
KaberD. B.EndsleyM. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theor. Issues Ergonom. Sci., 5, 113–153.
7.
KirshD. (2001). The context of work, Human computer Interaction, 16, 305–322.
8.
MatthewsT.RattenburyT.CarterS. (2007). Defining, designing, and evaluating peripheral displays: An analysis using activity theory. Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 221–261.
9.
MonsellS. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 134–140.
10.
MorayN. (1984). Attention to dynamic visual displays in man-machine systems. In ParasuramanR.DaviesR., Eds., Varieties of attention. New York: Academic, pp. 485–512.
11.
MumawR. J.RothE. M.VicenteK. J.BurnsC. M. (2000). There is more to monitoring a nuclear power plant than meets the eye. Human Factors, 42, 36–55.
12.
OsgaG. (2000). Task managed watchstanding - Concepts for 21st century naval operations. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13.
ParasuramanR.GalsterS.SquireP.FurukawaH.MillerC. (2005). A flexible delegation-type interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple robots: Empirical studies with RoboFlag. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics — Part A: Systems and Humans, 35, 481–493.
14.
RasmussenJ.VicenteK. J. (1989). Coping with human errors through system design: Implications for ecological interface design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31, 517–534.
15.
SarterN. BWoodsD. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37, 5–19.
16.
ScerboM. W. (2005). Adaptive automation. In ParasuramanR.RizzoM. (Eds.), Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
17.
SheridanT. B. (1987). Supervisory control. In SalvendyG. (Ed.), Handbook of human factors. New York, NY: Wiley.
18.
St. JohnM.KingM. (2010). Evaluating a display for making multitasking supervision assessments. Techical report. San Diego, CA: Pacific Science & Engineering Group.
19.
TurnerP. (2007). The CANES initiative: Bringing the Navy warfighter onto the Global Information Grid. CHIPS — The Department of the Navy Information Technology Magazine, Oct-Dec, 2007. Found on the web at http://www.chips.navy.mil/archives/07_Dec/web_pages/CANES.htm.
20.
VicenteK. J. (2002). Ecological interface design: Progress and challenges. Human Factors, 44, No. 1, pp. 62–78.
21.
VicenteK. J.MumawR. J.RothE. M. (2004). Operator monitoring in a complex dynamic work environment: A qualitative cognitive model based on field observations. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5, 359–384.
22.
WatsonM.SandersonP. (2004). Sonification supports eyes-free respiratory monitoring and task time-sharing. Human Factors, 46, 497–517.
23.
WoodsD. D. (1984). Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 229–244.
