Older adult drivers' disproportionate involvement in traffic fatalities coupled with growing population projections for this age group present a need for public policy that regulates the safety of our roadways. Before such a policy can be developed, a highly predictive model of the cognitive factors responsible for successful driving performance is necessary. The present study investigated the relationship between age and cognitive control on simulated driving performance to develop a predictive model for individual driving ability. Visual attention and working memory capacity of young adult college students and community dwelling older adults were tested using Useful Field of View® and Operation Span which are thought to measure aspects of attention. These scores were correlated with participants' simulated driving performance. Preliminary results indicated that attentional measures are important predictors of driving performance. Results are discussed in terms of implications for public policy related to driving and aging.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallK.OwsleyC.SloaneM.D.RoenkerD.L.BruniJ.R. (1993). Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehcle accidents in older drivers. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 34, 3110–3123.
2.
BallK.RebokG. (1994). Evaluating the driving ability of older adults. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 13, 20–38.
3.
BraverT.S.WestR. (2007). Working memory, executive control, and aging. In CraikF.I.MSalthouseT. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition, 3rd Edition (pp. 187–216). Erlbaum.
4.
BrownT. L.LeeJ. D.McGeheeD. V. (2001). Human performance models and rear-end collision avoidance algorithms. Human Factors, 43, 462–482.
5.
ConwayA.R.A.KaneM.J.BuntingM.F.HambrickD.Z.WilhelmO.EngleR.W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.
6.
EngleR. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23.
7.
GliskyE.L.PolsterM.R.RouthieauxB.C. (1995). Double-dissociation between item and source memory, Neuropsychology, 9, 229–235.
8.
Goldman-RakicP.S. (1987). Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In PlumF. (Ed.), Handbook of physiology: The nervous system, (Vol. 5, pp. 373–417) Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
9.
HoffmanL.McDowdM.M.AtchleyP.DubinskyR. (2005). The role of visual attention in predicting driving impairment in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 20, 610–622.
10.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (2002). Data on age and driving fatality rates.
11.
KaneM.J.EngleR.W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.
12.
La PointeL.B.EngleR.W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 16, 1118–1133.
13.
MantylaT.KarlssonM. J.MarklundM. (2009). Executive control functions in simulated driving. Applied Neuropsychology, 16(1), 11–18.
14.
McCabeD.P.RoedigerH.L.McDanielM.A.BalotaD.A.HambrickD.Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: Evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24, 222–243.
15.
National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (2009). Traffic Safety Facts Research Note: Fatal Crashes Involving young Drivers. Retrieved from: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811218.PDF.
OwsleyC.BallK. (1993). Assessing visual function in the older driver. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine: Medical Considerations in the Older Driver, 9, 389–401.
18.
RogersW.A.FiskA.D. (2000). Human factors, applied cognition, and aging. In CraikF.I.M.SalthouseT. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition, 2nd Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
StrayerD.L.DrewsF.A. (2004). Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors, 46, 640–649.
20.
TurnerM.L.EngleR.W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2005). Traffic safety facts 2005: Older population (DOT HS 810 622). Washington DC: National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Retrieved January 20, 2008, from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/810622.PDF.
23.
WatsonJ.M.BalotaD.A.Sergent-MarshallS.D. (2001). Semantic, phonological, and hybrid veridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in individuals with Dementia of the Alzheimer Type. Neuropsychology, 2, 254–267.
24.
WatsonJ.M.BuntingM.F.PooleB.J.ConwayA.R.A. (2005). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Jouranl of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 76–85.
25.
WatsonJ.M.LambertA.E.MillerA.E.StrayerD.L.The magical letters P, F, C, and sometimes U: The rise and fall of executive attention with the development of prefrontal cortex.
26.
WatsonJ.M.LambertA.E.MillerA.E.StrayerD.L. (in press). The magical letters P, F, C, and sometimes U: The rise and fall of executive attention with the development of prefrontal cortex. Chapter to appear in FingermanK.BergC.AntonucciT.SmithJ. (Eds.), Handbook of Lifespan Psychology, Springer.
27.
WestR. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272–292.
