Abstract
The subject of the current research is a Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) concept that involves automation-assisted separation assurance within the high altitude (at or above 29,000 feet) en route environment. The concept is designed to enable controllers to provide both safe and efficient air traffic services at much higher traffic densities than today. The presented research addressed the question of how responsibility should be handled for the resolution of a conflict that is predicted to occur in a sector other than where it was detected. Two possibilities, namely a De-Conflicting AirPlanes procedure (DCAP) versus a De-Conflicting AirSpace procedure (DCAS) were examined with recently retired controllers under human-in-the-loop simulations with scripted aircraft conflicts. Results showed that controllers preferred DCAS, in which they took less time to resolve conflicts and experienced less coordination with one another. However, the results did not yield significant differences among other plane performance metrics between DCAP and DCAS. The present analyses indicated that controllers are capable of meeting demands of NextGen with ownership/coordination procedures (e.g. DCAP.) similar to today. However, allowing separation assurance responsibilities to extend more seamlessly across sector boundaries (e.g. DCAS) could evidently be more agreeable for them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.