Interacting in 3D Space: Comparison of a 3D Two-handed Interface to a Keyboard-and-mouse Interface for Medical 3D Image Manipulation

Abstract

Interacting with computer-generated 3-dimensional (3D) data can pose challenges in the control of 3D objects and navigation in 3D space. The traditional mouse-driven interfaces are limited to controlling two degrees of freedom (DOF) at a time. The current research examines the efficacy of a two-handed interface (THI), “iMedic,” that uses two 6-DOF controllers that afford a more direct style of manipulation of 3D medical imagery. The iMedic interface employs a 3D “multi-touch” type of interaction for manipulation of objects, and self-navigation in space. Medical 3D images of human anatomy from computer tomography (CT) scans were used as a testbed in comparing the two interface: the THI, and a traditional keyboard-and-mouse interface (KMI) commonly used in medical imaging contexts. Novice system users with medical background used each system to carry out navigation, visual search, and measurement tasks with abstract synthetic and realistic anatomical objects. Results indicate that for novice users, there was no clear advantage to either interface in subjective or objective measures. However, a case study of an experienced user showed clear advantages in all tasks using the THI. Reasons for the findings are examined, and interface design implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

Narayan

M.A.

Perez-Quinones

M.A.

(2005). The use of hand-held devices for search tasks in virtual environments. Proceedings of the workshop on new directions in three-dimensional user interfaces (3DUI), IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), 15–18.

Dang

N.T.

Tavanti

Rankin

Cooper

(2007). A comparison of different input devices for a 3D environment. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 250 153–160.

de la Rivière

J.B.

Kervégant

Orvain

Dittlo

(2008). CubTile: a multi-touch cubic interface. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, October 27–29, 2008, Bordeaux, France. 69–72.

Elmqvist

Fekete

JD.

(2008). Semantic Pointing for Object Picking in Complex 3D Environments Pointing & Tracking. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Graphics Interface 2008. 243–250.

Froehlich

Hochstrate

Skuk

Huckauf

(2006). The GlobeFish and the GlobeMouse: two new six degree of freedom input devices for graphics applications. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2006 191–199.

Froehlich

Plate

(2000). The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, The Hague, The Netherlands. 526–531.

Goebel

Friesdorf

(2002). Evaluation of Input devices for 3D-navigation in medical applications. In: Luczak

Cakir

A.E.

Cakir

(eds.), WWDU 2002-World Wide Work, Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference on Work With Display Units. Berlin: Ergonomic Institut fuer Arbeits- und Sozialforschung, 435–437.

Jacob

R.J.K.

Sibert

L.E.

(1992). The perceptual structure of multidimensional input device selection. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Monterey, California 211–218.

Osawa

(2006). Automatic adjustments for efficient and precise positioning and release of virtual objects. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applications, June 14-April 17, 2006, Hong Kong, China 121–128.

10.

Poupyrev

Billinghurst

Weghorst

Ichikawa

(1996). Go-go interaction technique: Non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR. Proc. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST1996), ACM. 79–80.

11.

Roessler

Grantz

(1998). Performance Evaluation of Input Devices in Virtual Environments. Proceedings of the IFIP Working Group 13.2 Conference on Designing Effective and Usable Multimedia Systems table of contents. IFIP Conference Proceedings; Vol. 133, 68.

12.

Simon

Froehlich

(2003). The YoYo: A Handheld Device Combining Elastic and Isotonic Input. Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT1903, Rauterberg

(eds.), IFIP, pp. 303–310.

13.

Sreedharan

Zurita

E.S.

Plimmer

(2007). 3D input for 3D worlds Ambience & 3D interfaces. Proceedings of OZCHI1907, the CHISIG Annual Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 2007 227–230.

14.

Sundin

Weiss

Sundin

(2000). 6DOF Input Device Usability Test in a CAD Task Input Techniques and Mobile Interaction. Proceedings of the First Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 2000 n.44.

15.

van Rhijn

Mulder

J.D.

(2006). Spatial input device structure and bimanual object manipulation in virtual environments. Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, November 01–03, 2006, Limassol, Cyprus. 51–60.

16.

Zheng

X. S.

McConkie

G. W.

Schaeffer

(2003). Navigational Control Effect on Representing Virtual Environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, 2003. 2113–211.