One goal of a human factors design standard is to facilitate the development of consistent and usable systems. Ironically, human factors standards can plagued with the same issues that they are trying to prevent in systems, specifically, poor usability. This can be called the usability paradox. Poor usability in standards is likely to result in human factors requirements not being integrated into system development. This paper describes initial efforts to address the usability paradox in a specific standard. Researchers analyzed user data, then surveyed users to identify usability shortfalls and identify potential usability enhancements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhlstromV. (2005). A comparison of subject-based classification strategies for enhanced usability. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49, 1439–1443.
2.
AhlstromV.LongoK. (2001). Human factors design guide update: A revision to Chapter 8 - Computer human interface guidelines (DOT/FAA/CT-01/08). Atlantic City International Airport: Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center.
3.
AhlstromV.LongoK. (Eds.). (2003). Human factors design standard for acquisition of commercial-off-the-shelf subsystems, non-developmental items, and developmental systems (DOT/FAA/CT-03/05/HF-STD-001). Atlantic City International Airport, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration, William J. Hughes Technical Center.
4.
AhlstromV.LongoK.TruittT. (2002). Human factors design guide update: A revision to Chapter 5 - Automation guidelines (DOT/FAA/CT-02/11). Atlantic City International Airport: Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center.
5.
NelsonW.BoliaR. (2005). Interface heuristics and style guide design: An air battle management case study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49, 113–117.
6.
NielsenJ. (1993). Usability Engineering, San Diego, Academic Press.
7.
PostonA. (1999, May). Department of Defense Human Factors Engineering Technical Advisory Group. Minutes of the 42nd meeting, Alexandria, VA, O-2.
8.
VicenteK.BurnsC.PawlakW. (1998, April). Better handbooks, better design: Why current books describing human factors/ergonomics research and application don't meet designers' needs. Ergonomics in Design.
9.
WagnerD.BirtJ. A.SnyderM.DuncansonJ. P. (1996). Human factors design guide for acquisition of commercial-off-the-shelf subsystems, non-developmental items, and developmental systems (DOT/FAA/CT-96/1). Atlantic City International Airport, NJ: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center.
