Effect of Active and Passive Fatigue on Performance Using a Driving Simulator

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of active fatigue (e.g., elevated distress) and passive fatigue (e.g., decreased task engagement) on driving performance. The study used similar manipulations developed by Saxby et al. (2007), which were shown to induce active and passive fatigue states. 168 undergraduates participated. There were 3 conditions (active, passive, control) and 2 durations (10, 30 minutes). The active condition used simulated wind gusts to increase the required number of steering and acceleration changes, while the passive condition was fully automated. In the control condition, drivers were in full control of steering and acceleration. Data confirmed that, over time, passive fatigue is expressed as decreasing task engagement. Furthermore, drivers in the passive condition had slower response times to an unexpected event and were more likely to crash than those in the active and control conditions. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Desmond

P.A.

Hancock

P.A.

(2001). Active and passive fatigue states In Hancock

P.A.

Desmond

P.A.

(Eds.). Stress, workload, and fatigue, (pp. 455–465). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Desmond

P.A.

Hancock

P.A.

Monette

J.L.

(1998). Fatigue and automation-induced impairments in simulated driving performance Transportation Research Record, 1628, 8–14.

Desmond

P.A.

Matthews

Bush

(2001). Individual differences in fatigue and stress states in two field studies of driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, (pp. 1571–1575). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E.

(1988). Development of a multi-dimensional workload scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research In Hancock

P. A.

Meshkati

(Eds.). Human mental workload, (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Hancock

P.A.

Warm

J.S.

(1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention Human Factors, 31, 519–537.

Matthews

Desmond

(2002). Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 659–686.

Matthews

Campbell

S.E.

Falconer

Joyner

Huggins

Gilliland

Grier

Warm

J.S.

(2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress and worry Emotion, 2, 315–340.

Maxwell

S.E.

Delaney

H.D.

(1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia (2000). Beyond the midnight oil. Managing fatigue in transport. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Communications, Transport and the Arts. Retrieved December 6, 2004 from: http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/cita/manfatigue/report/chap1.pdf .

10.

Pratt

S.G.

(2003). Work-related roadway crashes: Challenges and opportunities for prevention. Technical report: NIOSH Hazard Review.

11.

Saxby

D.J.

Matthews

Hitchcock

E.M.

Warm

J.S.

(2007). Development of active and passive fatigue manipulations using a driving simulator. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51^st Annual Meeting, (pp. 1237–1241). Baltimore, MD: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

12.

Thiffault

Bergeron

(2003). Monotony of road environment and driver fatigue: A simulator study Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 381–391.

13.

Vic Roads (2007). Active and passive safety features. Retrieved August 18, 2007 from: http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/Home/RoadSafety/BuyingASafeCar/ActiveandPassiveSafetyFeatures.htm .