Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the best control mechanism for a hand-held neutron detector testing three control mechanisms (blister buttons, push-buttons and a single-axis rocker) and two control mechanism orientations (vertical and horizontal). A simple menu-selection task, based on the current neutron detector, was conducted to evaluate the prototypes and determine the most efficient combination of control mechanisms and handle shapes. The most efficient combination was based on the lowest error rate and movement time. The results of this investigation found support for the horizontally oriented controls. In addition, blister buttons were found to be the best control mechanism (lowest error) out of the three control mechanisms tested. Blister buttons should have a diameter of at least 1.3 cm and provide tactile feedback to the first responder in order to enhance user performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bikah

M. S.

Hallbeck

M. S.

Flowers

J. H.

(2006). Evaluation of Human Vibration Thresholds at Various Body Loci. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting. Orlando, Florida.

Caruso

A. N.

Jeppson

Dowben

P. A.

Adenwalla Balkir

Boag

N. M. S.

Brand

J. I.

Robertson

B. W.

Hallbeck

M. S.

(2007). “Interdiction of cross-border transport of fissile materials.” Packaging, Transport, Storage and Security of Radioactive Material, 18(3).

Castillejos

Hallbeck

M. S.

(2007). Evaluation of a hand-held neutron detector for usability, design, and comfort. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51th Annual Meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Castillejos

Herring

S. R.

Crowe

Hallbeck

M. S.

(in review). “Evaluation of handle shape and size andinput controls for a Neutron Detector.” Applied Ergonomics..

Chapanis

Lindenbaum

(1959). “A reaction time study of four control display linkages.” Human Factors, 1(4): 1–7.

Crowe

Castillejos

Herring

S. R.

Hallbeck

M. S.

(2008). Evaluation of a hand-held neutron detector for control design and screen view orientation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting.

Department of Defense (1999). Design Criteria Standard-human Engineering, MIL-STD-1472F. Philadelphia, PA, Navy Publishing and Printing Office.

Herring

S. R.

Hallbeck

M. S.

(in review). “Conceptual design of a wearable neutron detector alarm system: A review of the literature.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Sciences..

Krausman

A. S.

Nussbaum

M. A.

(2007). “Effects of chemical protective clothing on text entry when using wearable input devices.” Industrial Ergonomics(37): 525–530.

10.

Moore

T. G.

(1974). “Tactile and Kinaesthetic aspects of push-buttons.” Applied Ergonomics, 5(2): 66–71.

11.

Office of the Press Secretary (2002). Supporting First Responders Strengthening Homeland Security. United States Press Secretary, White House.

12.

Ray

R. D.

Ray

W. D.

(1979). “An analysis of domestic cooker control design.” Ergonomics (22): 1243–1248.

13.

Tyson

A. S.

(2008). 'Appalling Gap' Found in Homeland Defense Readiness Washington Post. Washington D.C. 01 February 2008.

14.

Woodson

W. E.

(1954). Human Engineering Guide for Equipment Designers. Berkeley, University of California: 1–24–1-28.

Improving Neutron Detection: Usability Analysis of Control Mechanisms and Control Orientations for Use in Hand-Held Devices

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References