An Evaluation of the Long Duration use of an Head Mounted Display

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to fill a gap in the literature concerning the long duration use of a near-eye head/helmet mounted display (HMD). This research has been an ongoing endeavor to create a Mobile Information SysTem (MIST) that could aid in Intravehicular (IVA) and Extravehicular (EVA) activities with astronauts. There have been numerous publications discussing the use of near-eye HMDs, or immersive environments, and physiological side effects, but relatively none examining long duration effects. Two participants wore the MIST, including a near-eye HMD, for approximately four hours to examine the long duration effects. Using a Cooper Harper, Corlett and Bishop Discomfort Scale, and NASA TLX, we found little to no significant differences between participants over time, and in most cases, scores improved with time. These results suggest that persons can don and use an HMD for long periods of time with no physical side effects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cooper

G.E.

(1957). Understanding and Interpreting Pilot Opinion. Aeronautical Engineering Review, 16(3): 47–51.

Cooper

G. E.

Harper

R.P.

Jr. (1969). The Use of Pilot Rating in the Evaluation of Aircraft Handling Qualities. NASA TN D-5153.

Corlett

E.N.

Bishop

R.P.A.

(1976). A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics, 19(2), 175–182.

Gallagher

D.G.

(1999). Development of miniature, head-mounted, virtual image displays for Navy divers. United States Navy Coastal Systems Station, Diving & Life Support Systems Division, Panama City, FL, pp. 1098–0014.

Hart

S.G.

Staveland

L.E.

(1987). Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock

P.A.

Meshkati

(Eds.) Human mental workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Hoffman

Litaker

Perchonok

Holden

Twyford

Conlee

Whitmore

(2007a). Usability Testing and Analysis Facility Maintenance Procedure Display–Head-Up Display (HUD) Evaluation–Phase 3. NASA-JSC SF/UTAF report, July 17, 2007.

Hoffman

Litaker

Solem

Holden

Twyford

Conlee Whitmore

(2007b). Usability Testing and Analysis Facility Maintenance Procedure Display–Head-Up Display (HUD) Evaluation–Phase 1. NASA-JSC SF/UTAF report, March 20, 2007.

Hoffman

Litaker

Thompson

Perchonok

Donahoo

Holden

Whitmore

(2007c). Usability Testing and Analysis Facility Maintenance Procedure Display–Pilot 2 Test of Voice Recognition. NASA-JSC SF/UTAF report, October 19, 2007.

Jennings

Gubbels

A.W.

Swail

C.P.

Craig

(1998). In flight evaluation of a fibre optic helmet mounted display. Proceedings of SPIE–The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 3362, 1998, pp. 126–135.

10.

Litaker

Thompson

Hoffman

Archer

Holden

Twyford

Conlee

Whitmore

(2007). Evaluation of the Use and Comfort of the Mobile Information System Technology (MIST) during a C-9 Flight: Part 2–Phase IV. NASA-JSC SF/UTAF report, November 2007.

11.

Luo

Kline

Fisher

Stubblefield

Kenyon

Kamper

(2005). Integration of augmented reality and assistive devices for post-stroke hand opening rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, Shanghai, China, September 1–4, 2005.

12.

Rash

Verona

R.W.

Crowley

J.S.

(1990). Human factors and safety considerations of night vision systems flight using thermal imaging systems. Proceedings of SPIE–The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 1290, 1990, pp. 142–164.