Interactive Effects of Backup Behavior and Spatial Abilities in the Prediction of Teammate Workload Using Multiple Unmanned Vehicles

Abstract

This study examined the interactive effects of spatial ability and team process on operator workload, while using multiple unmanned vehicles. The hypotheses also focused on how these effects might change when using different measures of spatial ability. In order to examine this, the Guilford-Zimmerman Spatial Visualization and Spatial Orientation scores of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operator and navigation support provided by this UAV operator to an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) operator were used as variables predicting UGV operator workload while performing a reconnaissance task. Results indicated that the interaction of the “guider's” spatial visualization and navigation support and the interaction between spatial orientation and navigation support not only accounted for unique variances in the prediction of his/her teammate's workload, but they also produced qualitatively different patterns of results. In identifying these unique contributions, the importance of using multiple spatial ability measures in (unmanned vehicle) research is highlighted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burke

J. L.

Murphy

R. R.

(2004). Human-robot interaction in USAR technical search: Two heads are better than one, Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2004. ROMAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 307–312).

Chadwick

(2005). The impacts of multiple robots and displays views: An urban search and rescue simulation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 387–391.

Chadwick

(2006). Operating multiple semi-autonomous robots: Monitoring, responding, & detecting. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 329–333.

Chen

Durlach

Sloan

Bowens

(in press). Human robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. Military Psychology.

Diaz

Sims

(2003). Augmenting virtual environments: The influence of spatial ability on learning from integrated displays. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 191–212.

Educational Testing Service. (2005). Cube Comparison Test. Princeton, NJ: ETS.

Educational Testing Service (1975). Card Rotations Test.

Guilford

J. P.

Zimmerman

W. S.

(1981). Manual of instructions and interpretations for the Guilford-Zimmerman Aptitude Survey (revised edition). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.

Hegarty

Waller

(2005). Individual differences in spatial ability. In Shah

Miyake

, The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge University Press.

10.

Ososky

Evans

A. W.

III Keebler

J. R.

Jentsch

(2007). Using Scale Simulation and Virtual Environments to Study Human-Robot Teams. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of Augmented Cognition International (pp. 183–189). Baltimore, Maryland.

11.

Rehfeld

(2006). The impact of mental transformation training across levels of automation on spatial awareness in human-robot interaction. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.

12.

Rehfeld

Jentsch

Curtis

Fincannon

(2005). Collaborative teamwork with unmanned vehicles in military missions, 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Vol. 11): MIRA Digital Publishing (CD-ROM).

13.

Tannenbaum

Beard

Salas

(1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In Kelley

, Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 117–153). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.