Curbing the over-harvesting of the earth's resources by the developed and developing world cannot be achieved solely by technological solutions. This paper reviews the literature on how reductions in energy consumption can be achieved through behavioral interventions. The literature shows that feedback, a consequence intervention, has been shown to be more effective than antecedent interventions in correcting erroneous heuristics and biases as well as encouraging both efficiency and curtailment behaviors. However, few feedback studies approach the feedback design problem systematically. Human Factors specialists have an opportunity to contribute their expertise in human-machine systems to help address these deficiencies and aid in shifting our societies toward sustainable resource consumption.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterJ. A., (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.
2.
BeckerL. J.SeligmanC. (1978) Reducing Air Conditioning Waste by Signalling it is Cool Outside. Peronality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 412.
3.
BendersRMJKokRMollHCWiersmaGNoormanKJ (2006) New approaches for household energy conservation. In search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy.
4.
BerkhoutP. H. G.MuskensJ. C.VelthuijsenJ. W. (2000). Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28(6/7), 425–432.
5.
BrandonG.LewisA. (1999). Reducing household energy consumption: A qualitative and quantitative field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 75–85.
6.
BremmerL. A.KoehlerD. J.LibermanV.TverskyA. (1996). Overcon-fidence in probability and frequency judgments: A critical examination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 212–219.
7.
Corral-VerdugoV. (1997). Dual “realities” of conservation behavior: Self-reports vs. observations of reuse and recycling behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 135–145.
8.
DarbyS. (2006). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A review for Defra of the literature on Metering, Billing, and Direct Displays. Defra.
9.
FaruquiA.GeorgeS. “Preventing Electric Shocks: What Ontario – and Other Provinces – Should Learn About Smart Metering.” C. D. Howe Institute Commentary. 210 (2005). 14.
10.
GardnerG. T.SternP. C. (1996). Environmental Problems and Human-Behavior. Boston: Pearson.
11.
GellerE. S. (1981). Evaluating energy conservation programs: Is verbal report enough? Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 331–335.
12.
GaterslebenB.StegL.VlekC. (2002). The measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34 (3), 335–362.
13.
HuttonR. B.MauserG. A.FiliatraultP.AhtolaO. T. (1986). Effects of Cost-Related Feedback on Consumer Knowledge and Consumption Behavior: A Field Experimental Approach. The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 327–336.
14.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
15.
KemptonW. (1986). Two Theories of Home Heat Control. Cognitive Science. Vol 10, pp 75–90.
16.
MiddenC.KaiserF.McCalleyT. (2007). Technology's four roles in understanding individuals conservation of natural resources. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 155–174.
17.
MorayN. (1995) Ergonomics and the global problems of the twenty-first century. Ergonomics38 (8), 1691–1707.
18.
ReesW. (2007). TVO Big Ideas. Toronto, Ontario. Retrieved June 6, 2007 from http://www.tvo.org/.
19.
RosenwaldM. S. (2008, May 26). For Hybrid Drivers Every Trip is a Race for Fuel Efficiency. The Washington Post, pp. A1, A10.
20.
SauerJ.SchmeinkC.WastellD. G. (2007). Feedback quality and environmentally friendly use of domestic central heating systems. Ergonomics, 50, 795–813.
21.
SeligmanC.DarleyJ. M.BeckerL. J. “Behavioral approaches to residential energy conservation,” Energy in Buildings, vol 1 (3). pp 325–337, 1978.
22.
TverskyA.KahnemanD., (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 211, 453–458.
23.
Van KesterenN. (2006). Technological innovations and the promotion of energy conservation: Satisfaction with and effectiveness of an in-business control system. In VerbeekP. P.SlobA.User behavior and technology development (181–189). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24.
WickensC. D.HollandsJ. G. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
25.
WinettR. A.NealeM. S.GrierH. C. (1979). Effects of self-monitoring and feedback on residential electricity consumption. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12 (2), 173–184.
26.
World Wildlife Federation (2006). Living Planet Report. Gland, Switzerland.
27.
WoodG.NewboroughM. (2003). Dynamic energy-consumption indicators for domestic appliances: Environment, behavior and design. Energy and Buildings35, 821–841.
