Subjective Ratings of Accessibility Using Full-Scale Bathroom Environments

Abstract

Full-scale modeling was used to assess subjective ratings of difficulty for the bathroom environment across four different configurations. Two configurations complied with nationally accepted accessibility standards. One exceeded the standards, representing a “universal design”; the other was representative of a common yet unsupportive design. Participants simulated activities of daily living and offered subjective ratings of each design in general, and for each sub-area (e.g. toilet, shower, lavatory) for each design. Results demonstrate subjective differences between bathroom configurations. The interaction between humans and the built environment should include a host of diagnostic tools complete with subjective assessments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Danford

G. S.

Steinfeld

(1999) In search of methods for measuring enabling environments. In: Steinfeld

Danford

G. S.

Measuring Enabling Environments. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.

International Code Counsel/American National Standards Institute (2003) ICC/ANSI A117.1–2003: Accessible and usable buildings and facilities. International Code Counsel.

Kochera

(2002) Accessibility and visitability features in single-family homes: A review of state and local activity. Research Report 2002–03. AARP. Washington, D.C.

Malassigne

Amerson

(1992) A survey on the accessibility of bathroom fixtures. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference IEEE: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Vol. 14(4): 1513–1514.

Roebuck

J. A.

Kroemer

K. H. E.

Thomson

W. G.

(1975). Engineering Anthropometry Methods, Wiley, 1975.

Stark

(2001) Creating disability in the home: The role of environmental barriers in the United States. Disability & Society. Vol. 16(1): 37–49.

Steinfeld

(2001) Full scale modeling as an anthropometric research method. In: Proceedings of Anthropometrics of Disability: An International Workshop).

Steinfeld

(2004) Modeling spatial interaction through full-scale modeling. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Vol. 33(3): 265–278.

Steinfeld

Danford

G. S.

(1997). Environment as a Mediating Factor in Functional Assessment. In Dittmar

Gresham

Functional Assessment and Outcome Measures for the Rehabilitation Health Professional. Gathersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc. 37–56.

10.

Steinfeld

Danford

G. S.

(1999). Measuring Enabling Environments. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

11.

Story

M. F.

Mueller

J. L.

Montoya-Weiss

, 2000. Progress in the development of universal design performance measures. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 2000 Annual Conference, pp. 132–134.

12.

U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1991) Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines: Design Guidelines for Accessible/Adaptable Dwellings. Federal Register. Vol. 56 (44).