The recent publication of three documents by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) evolves the previous understanding of the needs of deaf and hard of hearing computer users. This paper explores these new documents and their recommendations for this group of users. The implications of these new guidelines and their relation to other standards are also discussed.
Canadian Hard of Hearing Association (n. d.). Noise annoys It also damages your hearing [brochure].
3.
CarterJ.FourneyD. (2003). The Canadian position regarding the evolution of ISO TS 16071 towards becoming an International Standard (ISO TC159/SC4/WG5 Document N0731).
4.
CarterJ.FourneyD. (2004). Using a universal access reference model to identify further guidance that belongs in ISO 16071. Universal Access in the Information Society, 3(1), 17–29. http://www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=wdqpdu5pj0kb4q6b.
5.
DolanT.MaurerJ. (1996). Noise exposure associated with hearing aid use in industry. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(2), 251–260.
6.
FourneyD. (2007). Canadian National Body contribution towards the evolution of the User Needs Summary (JTC 1 SWG-A N 240). http://www.jtc1access.org/.
7.
ISO (2003). ISO TS 16071: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Guidance on accessibility for human-computer interfaces.
8.
ISO (2008a). ISO 9241–20: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Accessibility guidelines for information/communication technology (ICT) equipment and services.
9.
ISO (2008b). ISO FDIS 9241–171: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Guidance on software accessibility.
10.
ISO/IEC (2007). ISO/IEC PDTR 29138–1 Information Technology — Accessibility Considerations for People with Disabilities — Part 1: User Needs Summary. http://www.jtc1access.org/.
11.
JTC 1 SWG-A Secretariat (2007). Final Draft Agenda for the 23–27 April 2007 Meeting of the JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) - Hamar, Norway (JTC 1 SWG-A N 247). http://www.jtc1access.org/.
12.
LaszloC. (1994). Is there a hard-of-hearing identity? Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(4), 248–252.
13.
NadolJ. (1993). Hearing loss. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(15), 1092–1102.
14.
PaddenC.HumphriesT. (2005). Inside Deaf culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
RossM. (2004, May 25). Telecoils deserve wider acceptance as assistive listening devices. ASHA Leader, 9(10), 30.
VanderheidenG. (1988). Considerations in the design of computers and operating systems to increase their accessibility to persons with disabilities [Technical Report]. Madison, WI: Trace R&D Center, 2107 Engineering Centers Bldg., 1550 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706. http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/considerations/consider.txt.
