This paper describes the evolution of the conformance approach used in the currently published software ergonomic standards. Essentially, the conformance approach is based on a “pragmatic” two-step process. First determining the applicability of a requirement/recommendation and then determining whether the requirement/recommendation has been met. This paper also describes experience with the approach in different contexts, discussion of the use of the approach, problems encountered and suggestions for improvements.
HFES 200Human Factors Engineering of Software User Interfaces, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2008.
3.
International Organization for Standardization, 1997Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 14: Menu dialogues, Geneva, Switzerland.
4.
International Organization for Standardization, 2006Ergonomics of human-system interaction —Part 110: Dialogue princiles, Geneva, Switzerland.
5.
International Organization for Standardization, 2007Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 171: Guidance on software accessibility, Geneva, Switzerland.
6.
ReedPHoldawayK.IsenseeS.BuieE.FoxJ.WilliamsJ.LundA., User interface guidelines and standards: Progress issues, and prospects, in Interacting with Computers, 12, 1999, p 119–142.
7.
WilliamsJ. R., In: SalvendyG.SmithM.Guidelines for dialogue design, in Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based systems, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1989.
8.
WilliamsJ. R., Applying the ISO Software Ergonomic Standards: A Case History (unpublished), Telcordia Technologies, Piscataway, NJ, 2001.
