Traditional hierarchical command and control was pitted against a network centric alternative on a common task played thirty times by two teams. Multiple regression was used to undertake a simple form of time series analysis. Whilst the network centric condition ended up being slightly slower than its hierarchical counterpart, it was able to balance and optimise three other factors: team cohesion, enemies neutralized and attrition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CleggC. W. (2000). Sociotechnical principles for system design. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 463–477.
2.
FerbracheD. (2003). Network enabled capability: Concepts and delivery. Journal of Defence Science, 8(3), 104–107.
3.
HarrisC. J.WhiteI. (1987). Advances in command, control & communication systems. London: Peregrinus.
4.
LeeJ. D. (2001). Emerging challenges in cognitive ergonomics: Managing swarms of self-organising agent-based automation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2(3), 238–250.
5.
ScacchiW. (2004). Socio-technical design In BainbridgeW. S. (ed), The encyclopaedia of human computer interaction. Location: Berkshire Group.
6.
ViegasF. B.WattenbergM.McKeonM. (2007). The Hidden Order of Wikipedia. In SchulerD. (ed): Online Communities and Social Computing, HCII 2007, LNCS 4564, pp. 445–454. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7.
CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266.
8.
WoodsD.DekkerS. (2000). Anticipating the effects of technological change: A new era of dynamics for human factors. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1(3), 272–282.
