Cue Generation amongst Firefighters: Competent vs. Expert Differences

Abstract

Empirical investigations of cognitive skill acquisition have generally focused on differences between novice and expert operators. The result is a neglect of the intermediate stage of skill acquisition in which operators progress through competence towards expert performance. This study investigated the qualitative and quantitative differences in the cognitive cues generated by competent and expert firefighters. Participants first read a written, firefighting-related decision scenario before listing the cues that they considered relevant in formulating a decision. The results revealed that experts generated significantly more cues than competent operators. Further, the types of cues generated by competent and expert operators differed, with experts reporting significantly more safety-related cues than competent operators. These outcomes suggest that differences exist between the cues that are employed by expert and competent operators during decision-making, and that these differences reflect a qualitative change in information processing that occurs during the transition from competence to expertise.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dreyfus

H. L.

Dreyfus

(1986). Mind over machine: The powers of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.

Jackson

R. C.

Warren

Abernethy

(2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123, 355–371.

Klein

(1989). Recognition-primed decisions (RPD). Advances in Man-Machine Systems, 5, 47–92.

McLennen

Omodei

Holgate

Wearing

A. J.

(2007). Human information processing aspects of effective emergency incident management decision making. In Cook

Noyes

Masakowski

, Decision Making in Complex Environments (pp. 143–151). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.

Reischman

R. R.

Yarandi

H. N.

(2002). Critical care cardiovascular nurse expert and novice diagnostic cue utilization. Issues and Innovation in Nursing Practice, 39(1), 24–34.

Satish

Streufert

(2002). Value of a cognitive simulation in medicine: Towards optimizing decision making performance of health care personnel. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11, 163–167.

Shanteau

(1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision-makers. Acta Psychologica, 68, 203–215.

Shanteau

(1992). How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant?. Acta Psyhchologica, 81, 75–86.

Shiffrin

R. M.

Schneider

(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

10.

Spence

M. T.

Brucks

(1997). The modelling effects of problem characteristics on experts and novices judgements. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (2), 233–247.

11.

Stokes

A. F.

Kemper

Kite

(1997) Aeronautical decision making, Cue recognition, and expertise under time pressure. In Zsambok

C. E.

Klein

, Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 183–196. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

12.

Wallis

T. S. A.

Horswill

M. S.

(2007). Using fuzzy signal detection theory to determine why experienced and trained drivers respond faster than novices in a hazard perception test. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 1177–1185.

13.

Wiggins

M. W.

(2006). Cue-based processing and human performance. In Karwowski

Encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (2nd ed) (pp. 641–645). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.

14.

Wiggins

O'Hare

(2003). Weatherwise: Evaluation of a cue-based training approach for the recognition of deteriorating weather conditions during flight. Human Factors, 45(2), 337–345.

15.

Wiggins

Stevens

Howard

Henley

O'Hare

(2002). Expert, intermediate and novice performance during simulated pre-flight decision-making. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 162–167.