Issues That Precipitate Errors in Airline Maintenance

Abstract

Human factors in Federal Aviation Regulation Part 121 aircraft maintenance operations as they relate to technician performance are important factors that play a significant role in the public safety of air transportation systems. This paper reports on the results of an analysis of one thousand National Aeronautical and Space Administration “Aviation Safety Reporting System” incident reports for aircraft maintenance related issues. This paper identifies aircraft types, including systems, and compares events that precipitate human errors. Five high profile performance based error categories were selected for this paper. They include: technician qualifications, inspections, parts installation, contract maintenance, and log book documentation issues.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chappell

(1997). Using voluntary incident reports for human factors evaluations. In Johnston

McDonald

Fuller

Aviation Psychology in Practice (pp. 149–169. VT: Ashgate.

Connell

(1999). Incident reporting: The NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System. GSE Today, 66–68.

Drury

(1999). Human factors in aviation maintenance. In Garland

Wise

Hopkin

Handbook of Aviation Human Factors (pp. 591–605. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (1997). Aviation Safety Reporting Program Advisory Circular 00–46D. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (2002). Aviation Safety Action Program Advisory Circular and Guidance AC 12–66B. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (2007). CFR 121–369-B2 Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (2007). CFR 43.9 Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

Fitts

P. M.

Jones

R. E.

(1947). Analysis of 270 “pilot error” experiences in reading and interpreting aircraft instruments. In Air Material Command. Dayton, OH: Wright Patterson AFB.

Fogarty

(2004). The role of organizational and individual differences variables in aircraft maintenance performance. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 4(3):73–90.

10.

Hart

C. A.

(2004). Stuck on a plateau: A common problem. In Accident Precursor Analysis and Management: Reducing Technological Risk Through Diligence, (pp. 147–154). National Academies Press.

11.

Heinrich

(1959). Industrial accident prevention: a scientific approach (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Hobbs

Williamson

(2003). Associations between errors and contributing factors in aircraft maintenance. Human Factors, 45(2), 186–201.

13.

Kirwan

Ainsworth

(1992). A guide to task analysis. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

14.

NASA (2000). Aviation safety reporting system program overview. From http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/overview_nf.htm.

15.

Petersen

(1988) Safety management: a human approach. Aloray Pub, 2nd edition.

16.

Reynard

(1992). The acquisition and use of incident data. NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.

17.

Reynard

Billings

Cheaney

Hardy

(1986). The development of the NASA aviation safety reporting system. NASA Reference Publication 1114. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

18.

Reason

(1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Taylor

Patankar

(2001). Four generations of MRM: Evolution of human error management programs in the United States. Journal of Air Transportation World Wide 6(2):3–32.

20.

von Thaden

T. L.

Wiegmann

D. A.

(2001). Improving incident reports using a schematic recall aid: The critical event reporting tool (CERT). Proceedings of 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.