A Flight Test Evaluation of the Arc Segment Attitude Reference for Use as a Primary Flight Reference in Helmet-Mounted Displays

Abstract

The objective of this evaluation was to determine if the use of the Arc Segment Attitude Reference (ASAR) symbology in a head-up display (HUD) in place of the legacy climb-dive ladder attitude reference aids in unusual attitude recovery (UAR) piloting tasks as specified in AFM 11–217 for use as a primary flight reference (PFR). Flight tests were conducted at the US Air Force Test Pilot School (TPS), Edwards AFB, California on the NF-16D Variable-stability In-flight Simulator Test Aircraft (VISTA). Five VISTA flight UAR test sorties were flown. The time for the pilot to initiate a recovery was measured in addition to the correctness of the recovery. The flight tests were conducted with the use of the HUD combiner on VISTA to examine three symbology configurations. Each of the symbology configurations, the Mil-Std-1787C HUD, dual-articulated (DA) HUD, and ASAR HUD were evaluated by five pilots for the UAR task. The flight test results revealed the ASAR resulted in faster stick input for correction of UARs then the Mil-Std-1787C HUD. This study along with other supporting research indicates that the configural design properties of the ASAR support the ability of pilots to quickly ascertain aircraft attitude.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Endsley

M. R.

(1995). Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic-Systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.

Fischer

Fuchs

(1992). Symbology for head-up and head-down applications for highly agile fighter aircraft—to improve spatial awareness. In Proceedings of AGARD Symposium on Combat Automation of Airborne Weapon Systems Man/Machine Interface: Trends and Technologies, AGARD-CP-520, Edinburgh, 19–22.

Fuchs

Fischer

(1995). Arc Segment Attitude Reference—ASAR. In Proceedings of AGARD Symposium on Flight Simulation: Where are the challenges, AGARD-CP-577.

Jenkins

J. C.

Gallimore

J. J.

(2008). Configural features of helmet-mounted displays to enhance pilot situation awareness. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, Apr; 79(4):397–407.

Jenkins

J. C.

Gallimore

J. J.

(2007). The use of configural displays to promote pilot situation awareness. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Edited by Verly, Jacques G.; Guell, Jeff J., Enhanced and Synthetic Vision, Volume 6559.

Jenkins

J. C.

Thurling

A. J.

Havig

P. R.

Geiselman

E. E.

(2002). Flight test evaluation of the non-distributed flight reference off-boresight helmet-mounted display symbology. Proceedings of SPIE, Helmet-Mounted Displays VII, Lewandowski

R. J.

Haworth

L. A.

Girolamo

H. J.

(eds), SPIE, Bellingham, Washington, pp. 341–355.

Turner

Hattendorf

(1993). Standardized head-up display symbology evaluation, Air Force Flight Test Center Technical Report, AFFTC-TR-92–15, Edwards AFB CA.

U. S. Department of the Air Force (1996). Air Force Manual 11–217, Instrument Flight Procedures. Headquarters USAF, Washington DC.

U. S. Department of Defense. (2000). MIL-STD-1787C, Department of defense interface standard for aircraft display symbology. Philadelphia, PA: Defense Automated Printing Service.

10.

Weinstein

L. F.

Ercoline

W. R.

McKenzie

Bitton

D. F.

Gillingham

K. K.

(1993). Standardization of aircraft control and performance symbology on the USAF head-up display. Armstrong Laboratory Technical Report, AL/CF-TR-1993–0088, Brooks AFB TX.

11.

Wickens

C. D.

(2007). Aviation. In Handbook of Applied Cognition, II, 361–389. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.