Visual Information in Judgments of Head-On Collisions

Abstract

Head-on collisions result in a substantial number of fatalities. To detect head-on collisions, drivers must judge effectively the direction or heading of their own vehicle in relation to the heading of oncoming vehicles. In our previous study, we used computer simulations of self-motion through a traffic scene to measure judgments about whether a head-on collision was imminent. Results suggested that judgments about head-on collision are affected by both the optical flow information provided by the centerline and the optical flow information provided by the oncoming car. The objective of the current study was to further examine the effect of different components of the optical flow pattern on judgments of head-on collisions. We measured judgments about head on collisions while manipulating local optical flow from the oncoming car and global optical flow from the background scenery. Our results suggest that visual information about the oncoming car's motion was more effective than visual information about self motion. The implication is that it may be beneficial for drivers to focus greater attention on the information about the oncoming car's motion in order to improve judgments about head-on collisions. Further research is needed to evaluate this possibility.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

G. J.

(1990). Segregation of optic flow into object and self-mot ion components: Foundations for a general model. In Warren

Wertheim

A. H.

(Eds.), Perception & control of self-motion (pp. 127–141). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

Burgess

(2005). Contrasting rural and urban fatal crashes 1994–2003. DOT HS 809 896. Washington, D. C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

DeLucia

P.R.

Mork

K.S.

(2006). Identifying the driving factors that affect judgments of head-on collisions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Federal Highway Administration (n.d.). Road safety fact sheet. Retrieved on October 16, 2005 from, http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/facts/road_factsheet.htm.

Federal Highway Administration (2004). Manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways. Washington, D. C.: Federal Highway Administration.

Gray

Regan

(2000). Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision. Current Biology, 10, 587 590.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2005). Traffic safety facts 2005: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. Washington, DC. DOT HS 810631.

Tharanathan

DeLucia

P.R.

(2006). Time-to-collision judgments of constant and non-constant velocities: Implications for rear-end collisions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Warren

W. H.

Morris

M. W.

Kalish

(1988). Perception of translational heading from optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 646 660.