Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In process control, the ongoing automation and application of new technologies caused a radical change in the position of the operator. Due to this change, increasing manning constraints and the pressure to maximize the operational capability in the Navy, naval operators need personalized and dynamic support which can differ in time: the system should accommodate the user with the right task support at the right time. This paper presents the design and user evaluation of an interface with task allocation support. This kind of support enables the operator to redirect the alarm (system or operator initiated). Evaluation with 34 navy students shows positive results on performance and general usability. Performance increases because the most important problems are solved faster. However, performance on a less important task decreases and can be interpreted as ‘reallocation costs’. Results on questionnaires show an increasing insecurity on the predictability of the system.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey

B. P.

Konstan

J. A.

, “The effects of interruptions on task performance: Annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface.”, Interact, 2001, pp. 593–601.

Davidson

G. L.

Nguyen

T. V.

, “Human machine interface development design guidelines and cost estimation”, Thirteenth International Ship Control Systems Symposium (SCSS), 2003.

Grootjen

Bierman

E. P. B.

Neerincx

M. A.

, “Optimizing cognitive task load in naval ship control centres: Design of an adaptive interface”, IEA 16th World Congress on Ergonomics, 2006a.

Grootjen

Neerincx

M. A.

Weert

J. C. M.

, “Task Based Interpretation of Operator State Information for adaptive support”, Foundations of Augmented Cognition 2nd Edition, 2006b, pp. 236–242.

Grootjen

Neerincx

M. A.

Weert

J. C. M.

Truong

K. P.

, “Measuring Cognitive Task Load on a Naval Ship: Implications of a Real World Environment”, Proceedings of HCII/ACI, 2007.

Grootjen

Neerincx

M. A.

Passenier

P. O.

, “Cognitive task load and support on a ship's bridge: Design and evaluation of a prototype user interface”, INEC 2002 Conference Proceedings, 2002, pp. 198–207.

Mulder

J. M. F.

, “Supporting the internal battle”, Thirteenth International Ship Control Systems Symposium (SCSS), 2003.

Nagata

S. F.

Oostendorp

Neerincx

M. A.

, “A User Based Framework to Support Multitasking on a Mobile Device”, HCII 2005, Vol. Volume 1 - Engineering Psychology, Health and Computer System Design, 2005.

Neerincx

M. A.

, “Cognitive task load design: Model, methods and examples,” Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, edited by Hollnagel

Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2003, pp. 283–305.

10.

Neerincx

M. A.

Lindenberg

, “DISCII: Design of interface support for task-set switching and integration”, TNO Human Factors Research Institute, 2000.

11.

Niwa

Hollnagel

, Enhancing operator control by adaptive alarm presentation. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 5[3], 367–384. 2001. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

12.

Noldus. Observer XT. [6.0]. 2006. http://www.noldus.com/.

13.

Stanton

N. A.

Baber

, “The ergonomics of command and control”, Ergonomics, Vol. 49, No. 12–13, 2006, pp. 1131–1138(8).

14.

Trafton

J. G.

Altmann

E. M.

Brock

D. P.

Mintz

F. E.

, “Preparing to resume an interrupted task effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal”, Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 58, 2003, pp. 583–603.

15.

Zijlstra

F. R. H.

, Efficiency in work behaviour. 1993. Delft university press.

Dynamic Task Load Scheduling for Platform Control and Navigation on a Naval Ship

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References