Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Two experiments examined the potential effect of perceptual binding in the auditory and tactile modalities for one stimulus parameter: dynamic frequency sweeps versus static frequencies. Experiment 1 established baseline performance for identifying a single stimulus presentation. Experiment 2 examined the effects of presenting simultaneous auditory and tactile signals while attempting to focus on a single sensory channel. Experiment 1 demonstrates that identifying the frequency sweep or static signal is relatively easy in both modalities. Experiment 2 shows the unidirectional domination of auditory signals over tactile, irrespective of sensory focus modality. Overall findings and the implications for design and directions for future research are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gescheider

G. A.

Hoffman

K. E.

Harrison

M. A.

Travis

M. L.

Bolanowski

S. J.

(1994). The effects of masking on vibrotactile temporal summation in the detection of sinusoidal and noise stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1006 1016.

Gescheider

G.A.

Niblette

R. K.

(1967). Cross-modality masking for touch and hearing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(3), 313 320.

Gilson

R. D.

Redden

E. S.

Hancock

P. A.

(in press). Remote touch: Independent covert information. Technical Report. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.

Gilson

R. D.

(in press). Tactile masking and pattern recognition. Technical Report. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.

Gunther

Davenport

O'Modhrain

(2002). Cutaneous grooves: Composing for the sense of touch. Proceedings of Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression, Dublin, Ireland, 1–6.

Kalat

J. W.

(2007). Biological Psychology (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Kandel

E. R.

Schwartz

J. H.

Jessell

T.M.

(2000). Principles of Neural Science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Loomis

J. M.

(1981). Tactile pattern perception. Perception, 10, 5 27.

Mahar

D. P.

Mackenzie

B. D.

(1993). Masking, information integration, and tactile pattern perception: A comparison of the isolation and integration hypotheses. Perception, 22 (4), 483–96.

10.

Pettit

R. A.

Redden

E. S.

Carstens

C. C.

(in press). A Comparison of Hand and Arm Signals to a Covert Tactile Communication System in a Dynamic Environment. Technical Report. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.

11.

Soto-Faraco

Spence

Kingstone

(2004). Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: Extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(2), 208 217.

12.

Verrillo

R. T.

(1966). Vibrotactile sensitivity and the frequency response of the Pacinian corpuscle. Psychonomic Science, 4, 135 136.

13.

Verillo

R. T.

Caparo

A. J.

(1974). Effect of simultaneous auditory stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(3), 597 600.

14.

Wickens

C. D.

(1992). Attention, time-sharing, and workload. In Pearson

Caterer

C.M.

(Eds.), Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, (364–411). New York, NY: HarperCollins.

15.

Wickens

C. D.

(2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3(2), 159 177.

Dynamic Frequencies and Perceptual Binding in a Combined Auditory-Tactile Task

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References