Body-fixed Orientation Sensors for Trunk Motion Sensing

Abstract

Awkward trunk postures and dynamic trunk movements are associated with increased risk of low back disorders (LBDs). Recent advancements in computing and micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) technology have resulted in high precision, compact, and relatively inexpensive commercial orientation sensors that address the workplace usage limitations of the most common kinematics measurement methods (video analysis, magnetic field sensors, and electrogoniometers). The purpose of this study is to review the available body-fixed orientation sensing technology for its use in ergonomics research and practice. A laboratory study of a custom MEMS accelerometer-based inclinometer highlights issues of axial orientation, vibration, and non-gravitational acceleration that affect orientation results from basic inclinometers. Techniques are presented for correcting for such issues in advanced sensors using computational methods and combinations of MEMS accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Body-fixed orientation sensors provide enhanced opportunities to identify and reduce harmful work postures that may reduce the prevalence and severity of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

M. A.

Dolan

Marx

(1986). An electronic inclinometer technique for measuring lumbar curvature. Clinical Biomechanics, 1(3), 130 134.

Analog Devices. (2006). ADXL203 - High Precision, ±1.7g, Dual Axis Accelerometer (Rev. A ed., pp. 1 12). Norwood, MA.

Ang

W. T.

Khoo

S. Y.

Khosla

P. K.

(2004). Physical Model of a MEMS Acceleromter for Low-g Motion Tracking Applications, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation (pp. 1345–1351). New Orleans, LA.

Boocock

M. G.

Jackson

J. A.

Burton

A. K.

(1994). Continuous measurement of lumbar posture using flexible electrogoniometers. Ergonomics, 37(1), 175 185.

Crossbow Technology Inc. (2006). CXTA Analog Tilt Sensors, 2006, from http://www.xbow.com.

Giansanti

(2006). Does centripetal acceleration affect trunk flexion monitoring by means of accelerometers? Physiol Meas, 27(10), 999 1008.

Jansen

J. P.

Burdorf

Steyerberg

(2001). A novel approach for evaluating level, frequency and duration of lumbar posture simultaneously during work. Scand J Work Environ Health, 27(6), 373 380.

Marras

W. S.

Lavender

S. A.

Leurgans

S. E.

(1995). Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. Ergonomics, 38(2), 377 410.

Microstrain Inc. (2007). Inclinometers and Orientation Sensors, 2007, from http://www.microstrain.com.

10.

Miller

B. J.

Fathallah

F. A.

(2006, October 16–20, 2006). The Effects of a Stooped Work Task on the Muscle Activity and Kinematics of the Lower Back. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.

11.

Otun

E. O.

Anderson

J. A.

(1988). An inclinometric method for continuous measurement of sagittal movement of the lumbar spine. Ergonomics, 31(3), 303 315.

12.

Paquet

V. L.

Punnett

Buchholz

(2001). Validity of fixed-interval observations for postural assessment in construction work. Appl Ergon, 32(3), 215 224.

13.

Punnett

Fine

L. J.

Keyserling

W. M.

(1991). Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. Scand J Work Environ Health, 17(5), 337 346.

14.

Saur

P. M.

Ensink

F. B.

Frese

(1996). Lumbar range of motion: Reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine, 21(11), 1332 1338.

15.

SignalQuest Inc. (2006). SQ-SI Solid-State MEMS Inclinometers, 2006, from http://www.signalquest.com.

16.

Vieira

E. R.

Kumar

(2004). Working postures: A literature review. J Occup Rehabil, 14(2), 143 159.