Objective: Design a protocol for conducting preoperative briefings within the context of cardiovascular surgery. Method: A combined questionnaire and semi-structured focus group approach involving four subspecialties of surgical staff (n = 47) was conducted to gather information concerning (1) attitudes towards preoperative briefings, (2) logistical issues related to the conduct and content of briefings and (3) potential barriers that might impede implementation. Results: Analyses revealed consensus among surgical staff concerning briefing benefits (majority were very positive), duration (< 10 min), location (in the OR), content (procedure, patient, and equipment issues) and potential barriers (staff availability, attitudes, case scheduling, and lack of resources). Differences in opinions arose concerning timing of the brief (e.g., before vs. after patient enters OR) and the role of key participants. Discussion: A prototype checklist for conducting preoperative briefings was developed based on these results. Additional research is needed to implement and validate its effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergB.Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 6th Edition. 2007; Allyn and Bacon: Boston.
2.
CartheyJDe LevalMRReasonJT. (2001). The human factor in cardiac surgery: Errors and near misses in high technology medical domain. Ann Thorac Surg;72:300–3005.
3.
CrittendenMD. (2006). The importance of pre-procedural briefings. STS News: Special patient safety edition, 12(1), 8–9.
De LevalMRCarthyJWrightDJFarewellVTReasonJT. (2000). Human factors and cardiac surgery: A multicenter study. J. Thorac Cardiovsac Surg; 119(4): 661–672.
6.
GawandeA.ZinnerM.StuddertD.BrennanT. (2003) Analysis of Errors Reported by Surgeons at Three Teaching Hospitals. Surgery, 133(6), 614–21.
LingardL.EspinS.WhyteS.RegehrG.BakerG.ReznickR.BohnenJ.OrserB.DoranD.GroberE. (2004) Communication failures in the operating room. Quality and Safety in Health Care13, 330–334.
9.
WiegmannD.ElBardissiA.DearaniJ.SundtT. (2006, in review). Empirical investigation of surgical flow disruptions and their relationship to surgical errors. Surgery.
