Briefing and debriefing are common practices for safety in high risk industries but are not systematically done in surgery. Regular debriefing of performance after operative surgery can greatly assist surgical trainees' development and help optimize learning from the limited time they spend in the Operating Room (OR). We developed and tested the NOTSS (Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons) behaviour rating system with subject matter experts. It allows surgeons to observe trainees' behaviour in the OR and provide them with structured feedback for improvement. This paper describes process of debriefing and the results of a pilot usability trial. The majority of participants reported that the NOTSS system was useful for debriefing trainees, provided a common language to discuss non-technical skills, and was a valuable adjunct to current assessment tools. Some surgeons found interpersonal skills more difficult to rate than cognitive skills. 73% felt that routine use of the system would enhance patient safety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerD.MulqueenC.DismukesR. (2001). Training raters to assess resource management skills. In SalasE.BowersC.EdensE.Improving teamwork in organizations (pp. 131–145). New Jersey: LEA.
2.
ChristianC.GustafonM.RothE.SheridanT. (2006). A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery, 139, 159–173.
3.
De CossartL.FishD. (2005). Cultivating a thinking surgeon. Shrewsbury: tfm publishing.
4.
De LevalM. R.CartheyJ.WrightD. J.FarewellV. T.ReasonJ. T. (2000). Human Factors and Cardiac Surgery: A Multicentre Study. Journal of Thorasic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 119(4), 661–672.
5.
DismukesR.SmithG. M. (2000). Facilitation and debriefing in aviation training and operations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
6.
DonaldsonL. J. (2006). Good doctors, safer patients: Proposals to strengthen the system to assure and improve the performance of doctors and to protect the safety of patients. London: Department of Health.
7.
EdmondsonA. C. (2003). Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452.
8.
FlinR.YuleS.McKenzieL.Paterson-BrownS.MaranN. (2006). Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre. The Surgeon, 4, 145–151.
9.
FlinR.YuleS.Paterson-BrownS.MaranN.RowleyD.YoungsonG. G. (2006). Experimental evaluation of a behavioural marker system for surgeons' nontechnical skills (NOTSS). Paper presented at the 50th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, San Francisco.
10.
GabaD. M.HowardS. K.FishK. J.SmithB. E.SowbY. (2001). Simulation-based training in anaesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): A decade of experience. Simulation and Gaming, 32, 175–193.
11.
GoldsmithT.JohnsonP. (2002). Assessing and improving evaluation of aircrew performance. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12, 223–240.
12.
GuerlainS.TurrentineB.AdamsR.CallandJ. F. (2004). Using video data for the analysis and training of medical personnel. Cognition Technology and Work, 6, 131–138.
13.
HealeyA. N.UndreS.VincentC. (2004). Developing observational measures of performance in surgical teams. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 13 (Suppl 1), i33–i40.
14.
HelmreichR.MussonD.SextonB. (2004). Human factors and safety in surgery. In NoraP.ManuelB.Surgical patient safety: Essential information for surgeons in today's environment. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.
15.
KlampferB.FlinR.HelmreichR. L.HauslerR.SextonB.FletcherG., et al. (2001). Group Interaction in High Risk Environemnts: Enhancing Performance in High Risk Environments, Recommendations for the use of Behavioural Markers. Berlin: GIHRE.
16.
LingardL.EspinS.RubinB.WhyteS.ColmenaresM.BakerG. R. (2005). Getting teams to talk: Development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 14, 340–346.
17.
LingardL.EspinS.WhyteS.RegehrG.BakerG.ReznickR., et al. (2004). Communication failures in the operating room: An observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 13, 330–334.
18.
LingardL.ReznickR.DevitoI.EspinS. (2002). Forming professional identities on the health care team: Discursive consructions of the ‘other’ in the operating room. Medical Education, 36, 728–734.
19.
MackenzieC. F.XiaoY.HorstR. (2004). Video task analysis in high performance teams. Cognition Technology and Work, 6, 139–147.
20.
RallM.GabaD. (2005). Human performance and patient safety. In MillerR.Miller's Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier.
21.
RallM.ManserT.HowardS. K. (2000). Key elements of debriefing for simulator training. Eurpoean Journal of'Anesthesiology, 17, 516–517.
22.
SchaeferH.HelmreichR.ScheideggerD. (1995). Safety in the operating theatre - PArt 1: Interpersonal relationships and team performance. Current Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 6, 48–53.
23.
StevensonK. S.GibsonS. C.MacDonaldJ.HoleD. J.RogersP. N.ByrneD. S., et al. (in press). Measurement of process as quality control in the management of acute surgical emergencies. British Journal of Surgery.
24.
StuddertD. M.MelloM. M.GawandeA. A.GandhiT. K.KachaliaA.YoonC., et al. (2006). Claims, errors, and compensation payments in Medical malpractice litigation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 354(19), 2024–2033.
25.
TempletonS.FeinmannJ. (2006, September 3rd). Arrogant surgeons ‘risk another Bristol babies scandal’ The Sunday Times.
26.
WayL.StewartL.GantertW.KingswayL.LeeC.WhangK., et al. (2003). Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries. Annals of Surgery, 237, 460–469.
27.
YuleS.FlinR.Paterson-BrownS.MaranN. (2006). Non-technical skills for surgeons: A review of the literature. Surgery139, 140–149.
28.
YuleS.FlinR.Paterson-BrownS.MaranN.RowleyD. (2006). Development of a rating system for surgeons' non-technical skills. Medical Education, 40, 1098–1104.
