Many critical situations in health care correspond to difficulties in teamwork, communication, and coordination. This study aimed at describing differences in coordination processes of high and low performing crews during a simulated anesthetic crisis. We coded the coordination process of 24 anesthesia crews during a simulated crisis scenario using a predefined set of observation categories. We compared the coordination patterns of crews with different clinical performance levels (CPL). During the actual crisis, several differences can be noted in the coordination processes of crews with different CPLs. For example, higher performing crews seem to have a more centralized coordination structure and spent less time on task management. This study provides empirical insights into the relationship of coordination patterns and CPLs during a simulated anesthetic crisis. A more comprehensive study including different types of crisis situations will support the development of specific coordination trainings to further improve performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakemanR.GottmanJ. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BrehmerB. (1996). Dynamic and distributed decision making. Journal of the Fire Service College, 1(2), 17–36.
3.
ChassinM. R.BecherE. C. (2002). The wrong patient. Ann Intern Med, 136(11), 826–833.
4.
DaviesJ. M. (2001). Medical Applications of Crew Resource Management. In SalasE.BowersC. A.EdensE.Improving Teamwork in Organizations. Applications of Resource Management Training (pp. 265–281). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
DonchinY.GohperD.OlinM.BadihiY.BieskyM.SprungC., et al. (1995). A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med23, 294–300.
6.
EntinE. E.SerfatyD. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41(3), 312–325.
7.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
8.
FousheeH. C.ManosK. L. (1981). Information transfer within the cockpit: Problems in intra-cockpit communications. In BillingsC. E.CheaneyE. S.NASA Tech. Paper 1875 (pp. 63–71). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
9.
GroteG.Zala-MezöE.GrommesP. (2004). The effects of different forms of co-ordination on coping with workload. In DietrichR.ChildressT. M.Group interaction in high risk environments (pp. 39–55). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
10.
HarrisonT. K.ManserT.HowardS. K.GabaD. M. (2006). Use of Cognitive Aids in a Simulated Anesthetic Crisis. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 103(3), 551–556.
11.
HeldJ.ManserT. (2005). A PDA-based system for online recording and analysis of concurrent events in complex behavioral processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 37(1), 155–164.
12.
HindmarschJ.PilnickA. (2002). The tacit order of teamwork: Collaboration and embodied conduct in anaesthesia. The Sociological Quaterly, 43(2), 139–164.
13.
JohannesenL. J.CookR. I.WoodsD. D. (1994). Cooperative communications in dynamic fault management. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting.
14.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (2004). 2003 sentinel event data. Jt Comm Perspect, 24(6), 11.
15.
LingardL.EspinS.WhyteS.RegehrG.BakerG. R.ReznickR., et al. (2004). Communication failures in the operating room: An observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care, 13(5), 330–334.
16.
MackenzieC. F.HorstR. L.MahaffeyM. A.Lotas (1993). Group decision-making during trauma patient resuscitation and anesthesia. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, 372–376.
17.
ManserT.WehnerT. (2002). Analysing action sequences: Variations in action density in the administration of anaesthesia. Cognition, Technology & Work, 4(2), 71–81.
18.
ManserT.HowardS. K.GabaD. M. (2005). An observation method to assess coordination processes in anesthesia. Paper presented at the International Meeting on Medical Simulation.
19.
OrasanuJ. (1990). Shared mental models and crew decision making (No. 46): Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory.
20.
OrasanuJ.FischerU. (1992). Distributed cognition in the cockpit: Linguistic control of shared problem solving. Paper presented at the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
21.
OserR.PrinceC.MorganB. B.SimpsonS. S. (1991). An analysis of aircrew communication patterns and content: Final Report, Naval Training Systems Center, Orlando, FL.
22.
SerfatyD.EntinE.DeckertJ. C. (1994). Implicit coordination in command teams. In LewisA. H.LewisI. S.Science of Command and Control: Part III: Coping with Change (pp. 87–94): AFCEA Press.
23.
SerfatyD.EntinE.VolpeC. (1993). Adaptation to stress in team decision making and coordination. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting.
24.
SutcliffeK. M.LewtonE.RosenthalM. M. (2004). Communication failures: An insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med, 79(2), 186–194.
25.
WilsonR. M.RuncimanW. B.GibberdR. W.HarrisonB. T.NewbyL.HamiltonJ. D. (1995). The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust163(9), 458–471.
26.
XiaoY.MackenzieC. F.PateyR.Lotas (1998). Team coordination and breakdown in a real-life stressful environment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd annual meeting.
