Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper describes use of a perceptual response survey instrument to assess the degree to which rankings by office workers of different key attributes of occupancy quality predict worker perceptions of their on-the-job productivity. Data were collected from a total of 434 workers employed in 10 different office sites. Results show that perceived levels of productivity are significantly correlated with rankings of perceived overall physical work environment and job quality. The correlation between perceived levels of productivity and perceived overall organization quality is marginally significant. No significant correlations are observed between perceived levels of productivity with rankings of perceived overall compensation, work station, and employment quality. The results should benefit employer decision-making regarding human factors/ergonomic (HF/E) interventions to improve office worker productivity.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aardex Corporation (2004). User effective™ buildings. Denver, CO: Aardex Corporation.

ASID (1996). Sound solutions. Washington, DC: American Society of Interior Designers.

Brand

J. L.

(2005). Rewarding knowledge worker productivity: beyond the corner office. (http://www.haworth.com/haworth/assets/Rewarding%20Knowledge%20Worker%20Productivity%20Beyond%20the%20Corner%20Office.pdf)

Brand

J. L.

Smith

T. J.

(2005). Effects of reducing enclosure on perceptions of occupancy quality, job satisfaction, and job performance in open-plan offices. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th annual meeting (pp. 818–822). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Brill

Weidemann

and BOSTI Associates (2001). Disproving widespread myths about workplace design. Jasper, IN: Kimball International.

Brynjolfsson

(1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM 36(12), 66–77.

Burnham

D. C.

(1982). Productivity: An overview. In Salvendy

, Handbook of industrial engineering (Chap. 1.4, pp. 1.4.1–1.4.12). New York: Wiley.

Fein

(1982). Financial motivation. In Salvendy

, Handbook of industrial engineering (Chap. 2.3, pp. 2.3.1–1.3.40). New York: Wiley.

Fisk

W. J.

Rosenfeld

A. H.

(1997). Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments. Indoor air 7(3), 158–172.

10.

Hedge

(1998). Quantifying office productivity: An ergonomic framework. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd annual meeting (pp. 974–978). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

11.

Leaman

Bordass

(2006). Productivity in buildings: The ‘killer’ variables. In Clements-Croome

, Creating the productive workplace (2nd ed.) (Chap. 10, p. 153). London: E&FN Spon.

12.

Mundel

M. E.

(1982). Productivity measurement and improvement. In Salvendy

, Handbook of industrial engineering (Chap. 1.5, pp. 1.5.1–1.5.28). New York: Wiley.

13.

Strassmann

P. A.

(2004). Defining and measuring information productivity. New Canaan, CT: The Information Economics Press.

14.

Sykes

D. M.

(2004). How acoustics affect human productivity. (http://www.telaid.com/speechprivacy_study_acousticsprod.shtml)

Occupancy Quality Predictors of Office Worker Perceptions of Job Productivity

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References