Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Typical hospital emergency departments (ED) use patient status boards as information tracking devices for providing safe care by supporting shared memory, latent processes, collaboration, shared cognition, communication and coordination. Traditionally, status boards are large, manually updated dry erase “whiteboards.” Though electronic patient tracking technologies are fast replacing manual status boards, significant questions remain regarding the design of these technologies and the manner in which they impact ED work. This paper describes part of a study which is documenting the transition from a manual status board to electronic technology in two different emergency departments. The impact of technology implementation on existing work practices, and insights on design of information technology for safety critical healthcare system are described.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aspden

Corrigan

J. M.

Wolcott

Erickson

S. M.

(2004). Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Chisholm

Dornfeld

Nelson

Cordell

(2001). Work interrupted: A comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 38(2), 146–151.

Chisholm

C. D.

Collison

E. K.

Nelson

D. R.

Cordell

W. H.

(2000). Emergency department work place interruptions: Are emergency physicians multi-tasking or interrupt driven? Academic Emergency Medicine, 7, 1239–1243.

Coiera

E. W.

Jayasuriya

R. A.

Hardy

Bannan

Thorpe

M. E.

(2002). Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust, 176(9), 415–418.

Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Cook

R. I.

Woods

D. D.

(1996). Adapting to new technology in the operating room. Hum Factors, 38(4), 593–613.

Heath

Luff

(2000). Technology in Action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Jensen

(2004). United hospital increases capacity usage, efficiency with patient-flow management system. J Healthc Inf Manag, 18(3), 26–31.

Kohli

Waldron

Feng

Katis

Jakubowski

Davies

et al. (2004). Utilizing the electronic emergency whiteboard to track and manage emergency patients. Medinfo, 2004(CD), 1688.

10.

Kohn

L. T.

Corrigan

J. M.

Donaldson

M. S.

(1999). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

11.

Mackay

W. E.

(1999). Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(4), 311–340.

12.

Mendonca

E. A.

Chen

E. S.

Stetson

P. D.

McKnight

L. K.

Lei

Cimino

J. J.

(2004). Approach to mobile information and communication for health care. Int J Med Inf, 73(7–8), 631–638.

13.

Parker

Coiera

(2000). Improving clinical communication: A view from psychology. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 7(5), 453–461.

14.

Wears

R. L.

Perry

S. J.

Cook

R. I.

(2005). The role of automation in complex system failures. Journal of Patient Safety, 1(1), 56–61.

15.

Weiner

(1985). Beyond the sterile cockpit. Human Factors, 27(1), 75–90.

Assessing the Impact of Computerization on Work Practice: Information Technology in Emergency Departments

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References