The Effects of Communication Modality and Spatial Processing Load on Distributed Team Performance in a Simulated C2 Environment

Abstract

The present study addressed the effects of communication modality and spatial processing load on team performance, workload, and situational awareness. Sixteen people served as paid participants in this study. Teams of two participants competed against a computer opponent in a RoboFlag simulation based on “capture–the–flag”. Participants either could or could not see their teammates' simulated vehicles during a trial, and they could send each other images or annotated images from their RoboFlag display. Results of the experiment indicated that team performance and situational awareness were increased, and team communication and workload were decreased when participants could see teammates' vehicles, and more limitedly, that transmission of spatial information between teammates is facilitated by the ability to communicate that information pictorially. Overall, results support the supposition that distributed team performance may be mediated by spatial processing load.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

D. S.

Hayes

R. E.

(2003). Power to the Edge. Washington, DC: CCRP Publication Series.

Baddeley

A. D.

(1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

D'Andrea

Babish

(2003). The RoboFlag testbed. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 22, 656–660.

Funke

G. J.

Galster

S. M.

Nelson

W. T.

Dukes

A. W.

(2006). Instant messaging and team performance in a simulated command and control environment. Proceedings of the 2006 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. San Diego, CA.

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E.

(1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock

P. A.

Meshkati

, Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science/North Holland.

Hertel

Geister

Konradt

(2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95.

Maxwell

S. E.

Delaney

H. D.

(2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

McGrath

J. E.

(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Taylor

R. M.

(1990). Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478, pp. 3–1 and 3–17). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD.

10.

Wickens

C. D.

(1980). The structure of attentional resources. In Nickerson

, Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

11.

Wickens

C. D.

Vidulich

Sandry-Garza

(1984). Principles of S-C-R compatibility with spatial and verbal tasks: The role of display-control location and voice-interactive display-control interfacing. Human Factors, 26, 533–543.