Simulator Sickness Scores According to Symptom Susceptibility,Age,and Gender for an Older Driver Assessment Study

Abstract

The incidence and severity of simulator sickness results for an older driver assessment study is reported. The data from a total of 118 participants comprised of 67 older drivers (aged 70–90; 37 male, 30 female) and 51 younger drivers (age 21–50; 22 male, 29 female) was used for this study. The primary objective of this project was to develop a PC-based program in conjunction with a low-cost driving simulator that can be used for screening and potentially retraining the psychomotor, attentional, and cognitive skills of older drivers. A large range of sensory, perceptual, psychomotor, and cognitive tests were provided to validate the driving simulator and/or provide a comprehensive older driver assessment test battery. Simulator sickness ratings after 5 driving simulator sessions were obtained using the Kennedy, Lane, Berbaum, and Lilienthal (1993) Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Dropout and scenario completion rates suggest a higher symptom incidence for older drivers, particularly older female drivers. Scenario design effects are also discussed as it relates to dropout rates. SSQ analysis using nausea, oculomotor, and disorientation subscales across driving simulator sessions were performed for dropout participants and non-dropout participants. Contrary to dropout rates, no age effects were found in the SSQ data. No gender differences were found within the dropout group, but found in the non-dropout group for nausea and oculomotor scores. No relationship was found between contrast sensitivity and simulator sickness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

R. W.

Park

G. D.

Fiorentino

Rosenthal

T. J.

Cook

L. M.

(2006). Analysis of simulator sickness as a function of age and gender. 9th Annual Driving Simulation Conference Europe Paris, France.

Edwards

C. J.

Creaser

J. I.

Caird

J. K.

Lamsdale

A. M.

Chisholm

S. L.

(2003). Older and younger driver performance at complex intersections: Implications for using perception-response time and driving simulation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design Park City, Utah, 33–38.

Graeber

D. A.

Stanney

K. M.

(2002). Gender differences in visually induced motion sickness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, 46, Baltimore, MD, 2109–2113.

Kennedy

R. S.

Lane

N. E.

Berbaum

K. S.

Lilienthal

M. G.

(1993). “Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness” Journal of Aviation Psychology 3(3): 203–220.

Kolasinski

E. M.

Gilson

R. D.

(1998). Simulator sickness and related findings in a virtual environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 42, Chicago, IL, 1511–1515.

Kolasinski

E. M.

Goldberg

S. L.

Hiller

J. H.

(1995) Simulator sickness in virtual environments. Technical Report 1027. Alexandria, VA. U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Lee

H. C.

(2002). The validity of driving simulator to measure on-road driving performance of older drivers. 24th Conference of Australian Institutes of Transport Research (CAITR) Sydney, AUS.

Mouloua

Rinalducci

Smither

Brill

J. C.

(2004). Effect of aging on driving performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, 48, New Orleans, LA, 253–257.

Mourant

R. R.

Thattacherry

T. R.

(2000). Simulator sickness in a virtual environments driving simulator. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, 1, San Diego, CA, 534–537.

10.

Riccio

G. E.

Stoffregen

T. A.

(1991). “An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability.” Ecological Psychology 3(3): 195–240.

11.

Rizzo

Sheffield

R. A.

Stierman

Dawson

(2003). Demographic and driving performance factors in simulator adaptation syndrome. Proceedings of the 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design Park City, Utah, 201–208.

12.

Roberts

K. W.

Gallimore

J. J.

(2005). A physiological model of cybersickness during virtual environment interaction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting Orlando, FL, 2230–2234.

13.

Stanney

K. M.

Kingdon

K. S.

Kennedy

R. S.

(2002). Dropouts and aftereffects: Examnining general accessibility to virtual environment technology. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, 46, Baltimore, MD, 2114–2118.